- From: Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:49:25 +0000
- To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Hi Francois, all, Some comments inline below: > From: Francois Daoust [fd@w3.org] > Sent: 28 September 2017 10:22 > To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org > Subject: Overview of Media Technologies for the Web > > Dear Media and Entertainment Interest Group, > > I have been working on an "Overview of Media Technologies for the Web" > document that lists Web technologies that can be used to build media > applications and services, and highlights known gaps: > > http://w3c.github.io/web-roadmaps/media/ > > [...] > > This overview should not be considered as anything else than work in progress > right now. Some technologies are probably missing, descriptions should be > improved. I wanted to share this document with you for two reasons: > > 1. to invite feedback on the document (look and feel, usefulness, structure, > content, etc.). > 2. to check whether the Media and Entertainment Interest Group would be > interested to adopt this document as working document. This looks like a very useful resource. I'd be more than happy to review, and help with keeping it up to date. I would also like to invite and encourage Interest Group members to contribute feedback. > In particular, the current charter of the Interest Group says that the group > will "maintain a public list of the media features on the Web that it is > tracking and investigating. These features will include identified gaps, > stable features deployed in browser implementations, as well as features > under development in W3C and external groups": > https://www.w3.org/2017/03/webtv-charter.html#deliverables > > I'm wondering whether the Overview document could provide a good basis for > that list, and a good working document to structure discussions within the > group. The website seems to serve that purpose well, so yes I think it could. One question, both for you, and also to IG members: would this be an appropriate place for us to capture new requirements, e.g., coming out of any new gap analysis work, where we would usually have used the IG wiki [1]? > If people are interested, I'll be happy to present that document during one > of the IG calls as well as during the group's F2F during TPAC. We're currently planning the TPAC agenda so it would be good to include an item on this. A future IG call is certainly possible too. > This document is intended to be lightweight to maintain and complete over > time. It is part of a series of roadmap-like documents, developed with a > common framework. The framework takes care of adding implementation data for > each feature/technology listed in the document, and of providing means for > users to navigate between pages. The framework is still very sketchy for the > time being, but will be maintained and improved by W3C team over time. > > You'll find more information about the ins and outs of such documents in: > https://github.com/w3c/web-roadmaps#framework-for-web-technology-roadmaps > > Feel free to raise comments on the associated issue tracker: > https://github.com/w3c/web-roadmaps/issues/ > (replies to this email are of course welcome as well) > > Thanks, > Francois. Many thanks, Chris (Co-chair, Media and Entertainment Interest Group) [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page
Received on Friday, 29 September 2017 14:52:18 UTC