- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:35:25 +0200
- To: 'Raphaël Troncy' <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Hi Raphaël, > From: Raphaël Troncy [mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr] > Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 11:33 AM > > Dear François, > > This is an excellent page, that nicely summarizes all existing and > relevant specs that I would definitively use in my teaching material. Thanks! > One gap though: I would consider that the W3C Media Fragments URI 1.0 > specification (https://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/) is very relevant. Good point, I had indeed missed that one! > I would put it first within the "Media Distribution" category, since > people share more and more video URIs with a hash fragment to jump > directly to a position in the timeline. The specification is also > relevant for the Media Rendering (the spec says what media players could > do when rendering media fragments) and Media Control categories. I guess this shows that it's hard to come up with a restricted list of categories that allow to dispatch technologies in a logical hierarchy. In any case, there is no requirement that a spec only needs to appear in one of these categories, so I prepared an update that adds the spec to all 3 categories, could you check and comment on the pull request? https://github.com/w3c/web-roadmaps/pull/94 Thanks for the review! Francois.
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2017 14:35:33 UTC