- From: Vickers, Mark <Mark_Vickers@comcast.com>
 - Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:21:34 +0000
 - To: "Meerveld, Colin" <C.Meerveld@activevideo.com>
 - CC: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
 - Message-ID: <94A183EE-AB7A-4DAE-8207-E90148FEF4EE@cable.comcast.com>
 
Hi Colin,
This document could be really important for people understand how cloud browsers fit in the web architecture. Thanks for starting this. It's quite helpful already.
I think that in addition to request/response sequences, you may want to add more discussion of data structures to the diagrams and discussions. For example, isn't it a key difference that the DOM is in the cloud in the cloud browser, whereas the DOM is in the client device in all the other designs?
FYI, there's also a few typos. In particular, I think a key noun is missing in the Cloud Browser paragraph before the "[1]" reference.:
"It could provide an [1] but has no relation with a resource..."
Thanks,
mav
On Jan 20, 2017, at 9:10 AM, Meerveld, Colin <C.Meerveld@activevideo.com<mailto:C.Meerveld@activevideo.com>> wrote:
As discussed during the meeting i added an article [1] which explains the differences between a cloud browser and a so-called split browser. I am not sure if we need to put it in the group note as-well.
Any comments and suggestion will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Colin
[1] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/cloud_browser_vs_split_browser
On 11 Jan 2017, at 16:54, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org<mailto:ashimura@w3.org>> wrote:
available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2017/01/11-webtv-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks,
Kazuyuki
---
   [1]W3C
      [1] http://www.w3.org/
                               - DRAFT -
                      Web&TV IG - Cloud Browser TF
11 Jan 2017
   See also: [2]IRC log
      [2] http://www.w3.org/2017/01/11-webtv-irc
Attendees
   Present
          Alexandra, Colin, Kaz
   Regrets
   Chair
          Alexandra
   Scribe
          kaz
Contents
     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Welcome2017
         2. [5]Short update of 2016
         3. [6]Current task - Architecture Group Note
     * [7]Summary of Action Items
     * [8]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________
Welcome2017
   alexandra: happy to find this new slot
   ... would like to ask people actively participated in the TF if
   they can participate this year as well
   ... the Cloud Browser TF has been extended until 30 April 2017
   ... and possibly can be extended until TPAC after the IG's
   extension
Short update of 2016
   alexandra: Colin has generated draft spec
   ... want to propose work on the draft and use cases in parallel
   ... talk about the draft first and then use cases next
   ... which work to be published as a group note?
   ... would propose Colin talk about the draft note
Current task - Architecture Group Note
   colin: draft on the wiki page
   ... highlights the basic concept of Cloud Browsers
   ->
   [9]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_T
   F/groupnote draft for the group note
      [9] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/groupnote
   alexandra: updated the diagram
   ... question on how to call the client
   ... Cloud Browser's client
   ... just put "EasyClient" as the term now
   ... if OK by you, would like to go with that
   kaz: maybe we should have a terminology section at the top of
   the document
   alexandra: tx
   ... the second one is description of components
   <alexandra> 1. easyclient
   <alexandra> 2. component description
   <alexandra> 3. split browser?
   <alexandra> 4. approach description
   alexandra: component description is kind of terminology section
   ... and then provide a couple of sentences for split browser
   colin: it is actually far from "easy" :)
   ... the name should imply what it does
   ... "client" has some specific meaning and Cloud Browser's
   client is a bit different from usual clients
   alexandra: can we stuck with "Cloud Browser Client"?
   kaz: we can start with that friendly term :)
   alexandra: and we can use "Cloud Browser Client" in our
   description
   colin: yes
   alexandra: ok
   ... next "component description"
   colin: is that a terminology section?
   alexandra: depends on how we start the document
   -> [10]https://www.w3.org/TR/hnreq/ home network requirements
   note
     [10] https://www.w3.org/TR/hnreq/
   kaz: we can use that note as a template
   alexandra: every term is defined at the beginning
   kaz: actually, we can start with actual requirements and pick
   up difficult terms and add them to the terminology section
   later
   colin: brief description of terms
   alexandra: we don't really have requirements at the moment
   kaz: we can simply describe our architecture instead
   <alexandra> ... intro, terminology, architecture section (with
   subsection 1-7 in current version)
   kaz: that could be an initial structure
   alexandra: ok
   ... can start the terminology section
   ... should we include some text about what we do and what we
   don't do
   colin: in the client section, I tried to explain the difference
   ... like split browser
   ... could help people understand the difference
   alexandra: would propose we have a separate section to explain
   the difference from usual browser
   colin: will do that
   kaz: if it's easier for you to directly use HTML, you can start
   to use GitHub
   colin: no problem with wiki or GitHub
   alexandra: will restructure the draft based on the discussion
   ... and start terminology section
   ... let's start to review in 2 weeks
   ... and then put the draft on the group's review
   colin: sounds like a good plan
   ... good to get more people
   kaz: quick question
   ... will on work on the use cases in parallel?
   alexandra: no, we'll concentrate on the architecture group note
   ... and then will work on the use cases
   kaz: ok, tx for your clarification
   [ adjourned ]
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________
    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [11]scribe.perl version
    1.148 ([12]CVS log)
    $Date: 2017/01/11 15:52:35 $
     [11] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [12] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
--
Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Auto, WoT, TV, MMI and Geo
Tel: +81 3 3516 2504
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 16:22:10 UTC