[Cloud Browser] minutes - 19 April 2017

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2017/04/19-webtv-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks,

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                       Web&TV - Cloud Browser TF

19 Apr 2017

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2017/04/19-webtv-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Colin, Chris, Kaz

   Regrets
          Alexandra

   Chair
          Colin

   Scribe
          kaz

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Use cases
         2. [5]Cloud Browser Architecture Note status
         3. [6]Use Case (revisiting)
     * [7]Summary of Action Items
     * [8]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

Use cases

   <coln>
   [9]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_T
   F/UseCases#Template_for_Cloud_Browser_Use_Cases

      [9]
https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases#Template_for_Cloud_Browser_Use_Cases

Cloud Browser Architecture Note status

   kaz: sent the transition request for the Note out
   ... and got some comment from W3C Team mates

   <coln>
   [10]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_
   TF/cloud_browser_vs_split_browser

     [10]
https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/cloud_browser_vs_split_browser

   kaz: I'll respond to that but maybe we might want to add
   references for existing mechanisms similar to the Cloud
   Browser, e.g., X Window System and Opera Mini

   colin: there is some description on the wiki about the
   similarity/difference

   kaz: what do you think about event exchange within X Window?

   colin: maybe the similarity is entity A renders the graphics
   and entity B handles user input

   kaz: ok

   colin: was planning to publish another note for split browser

   kaz: maybe would be better to put both within one document and
   explain the similarity and difference

   [11]cloud browser vs split browser

     [11]
https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/cloud_browser_vs_split_browser

   kaz: does ActiveVideo provide Split Browser as well as Cloud
   Browser?

   colin: our approach is kind of hybrid

   kaz: this wiki page is a good resource for our future
   discussions

Use Case (revisiting)

   [12]Use case wiki

     [12]
https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases

   kaz: maybe we might want to think about extensibility for UI
   for accessibility
   ... using various cloud services

   chris: using additional cloud services
   ... voice recognition, etc.

   kaz: it would be much easier than client-side browsers

   chris: any kind of devices can use that capability regardless
   of their own types

   colin: good to have that kind of use cases

   chris: applicable to any kind of devices like mobile
   ... device-agnostic approach

   kaz: there is a possibility that a cloud browser application
   can work on a smartphone
   ... would it be OK if Chris and I add some use cases?

   colin: great to have typical examples
   ... would be good to keep the scope within TV area

   kaz: ok to consider "accessible TV" by extending TV capability
   using accessibility portion?

   chris: should be ok

   colin: note that some other standardization bodies also handle
   accessibility standards

   chris: tree of connected devices and serialized resources

   colin: web technology allows you create accessible pages/apps
   ... using assistive technologies
   ... orchestration should handle accessibility

   kaz: Chris can provide some use cases for accessibility
   ... btw, how to combine broadcasting signals and IP-based video
   signal might be one use case for hybrid TV?

   colin: maybe out of scope of this TF?

   kaz: in that case, who would combine those signals?

   colin: there is only video element within Cloud Browser

   kaz: in that case, cloud browser doesn't care the source of
   video signals?

   colin: it depends
   ... there could be double stream approach

   kaz: how should we update this use case wiki?

   colin: we already have some use cases linked from this wiki

   kaz: so the expected next step is not only adding new use cases
   ... but analyzing the existing use cases and think about which
   are the "Impact Use Cases"?

   colin: yes
   ... and we need more people for that purpose

   kaz: wondering which would be our preference
   ... publishing a use case note based on this wiki right away
   ... or publishing a note after updating/analyzing the wiki

   colin: let's continue the discussion during the next call

   kaz: ok

   [ adjourned ]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [13]scribe.perl version
    1.152 ([14]CVS log)
    $Date: 2017/04/19 15:10:56 $

     [13] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/