- From: <Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 18:18:26 +0200
- To: <jfriedman@vusionvr.com>
- CC: <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DFCEF737B0F85B46B6CD03C6CEE84178E40C466DB2@HE111642.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Dear Jacob, This is a technology pitch, where we do not go into details. However, I have updated the figure accordingly, will that be OK? See [1]. The group first aims to put the API requirements together. Therefore, for the moment we do not decide how to integrate certain features. We have a dedicated accessibility Use Case for that matter in [2]. Will that be possible that somebody from the accessibility group will give us a hand and provide a first input for the accessibility Use Case? [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Architecture#Technology_Pitch [2] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases From: Jacob Friedman [mailto:jfriedman@vusionvr.com] Sent: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2016 16:37 To: Mikityuk, Alexandra Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org Subject: Re: [Cloud Browser] Technology Pitch Chapter Forgive me, but how would this be integrated with accessibility standards? Cheers Jacob On May 10, 2016, at 9:41 AM, <Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de<mailto:Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de>> <Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de<mailto:Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de>> wrote: Dear all, during our last call we have identified a missing part in our architecture description – a short technology pitch. See the corresponding action [1]. I have provided the first draft for the pitch, please see the corresponding chapter [2]. Waiting for your comments! [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/232 [2] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Architecture#Technology_Pitch
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 16:19:04 UTC