Re: [cloud browser] initial proposal Interest Group Note

Hi Ronen,

Thank you for this comment. I guess there will be more grammatical errors in this document. After a final review we should make sure a proficient technical writer will correct the errors.

Thanks,

Colin

On 13 Dec 2016, at 16:52, Ronen Mizrahi <ronen@tversity.com<mailto:ronen@tversity.com>> wrote:

Hi Colin,

Looks like there is a language issue in the sentence below:
"A cloud browser is a browser running and execution on a server"

Best,

Ronen

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Meerveld, Colin <C.Meerveld@activevideo.com<mailto:C.Meerveld@activevideo.com>> wrote:
Hi All,

I added a initial proposed Interest Group Note to the wiki [1]. After reviewing, it will be to publish as an formalised W3C publication. It is a short, lucid version of the Cloud TV Architecture [2] which will still be used (and modified) by the Task Force. The group note will also be used as an end result of the first phase of the Task Force, ended at TPAC 2016 [3]. The second phase will focus on the use cases.

Please let me know if you would like to add/change something.

Regards,

Colin Meerveld

[1] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/groupnote
[2] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Architecture
[3] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/TPAC/
[4] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases