[cloud browser] minutes - 17 August 2016

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2016/08/17-webtv-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking notes, Nilo!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                      Web&TV IG - Cloud Browser TF

17 Aug 2016

Attendees

   Present
          Colin, Alexandra, Steve, Nilo, Kaz

   Regrets
   Chair
          Alexandra

   Scribe
          Nilo

Contents

     * [2]Topics
     * [3]Summary of Action Items
     * [4]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <scribe> scribe: Nilo

   The architecture chapter is now finalized

   <alexandra>
   [5]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_T
   F/Architecture

      [5]
https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Architecture

   we should start to review the chapter and provide comments on
   clarity etc.

   Review it in the next two weeks

   Either send public comments or correct minor mistakes directly
   in the wiki

   We'll discuss the changes in the next meeting, two weeks from
   now.

   Chapter should be finalized before TPAC

   Colin: some of the terminology seems interchangeable
   ... look more closely at the differences between the text and
   images, e.g., what does "input data" mean?
   ... This way those who use our pictures (e.g., GSMA) will not
   have pictures which are not properly explained

   Alexandra has also updated the TF page

   <alexandra>
   [6]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_T
   F

      [6] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF

   Added Colin's text on introduction to the cloud browser.

   <alexandra>
   [7]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_T
   F/Introduction_cloud_browser

      [7]
https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Introduction_cloud_browser

   Colin notes that this is his perspective and would appreciate
   more input from others.

   cloud browser should not have any special APIs. This way
   applications do not have to change.

   Colin's second point is that the client should have a small
   addition, the RTE, which needs to communicate with the
   orchestration

   <colin> A Cloud Browser is unspecified. i.e. it could be
   everything from a html5 enabled browser to an android OS

   <colin> The client device should be agnostic only a small
   addition is needed called a RTE

   <colin> The RTE only provide input but doesn't interpreted it

   <colin> The RTE communicated with the Orchestration

   Aexandra notes that these points seem like requirements.

   The first point could be stated as a requirements: the browser
   should not be extended with any APIs.

   The signaling between the RTE and Orchestration needs to be
   standardized.

   Also, we should focus on the gaps in W3C specs to see if gaps
   exists. For example, a vibrate API might not work if the
   interaction is synchronous.

   Another example might be the determination of quality metrics
   at a client rather than at the browser.

   Colin suggests looking at W3C specs to identify cases where
   these might not work for certain use cases.

   There might be gaps found for accessibility in a cloud browser
   environment.

   Alexandra willl contact John F on accessibility use cases.

   <alexandra>
   [8]https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_T
   F/UseCases

      [8]
https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases

   Colin suggests splitting this so that at TPAC we finalize the
   architecture while after TPAC we concentrate on completing the
   use cases and requirements

   Alexandra also proposes finalizing the first 4 use cases

   Alexandra sill also provide a status document for presentation
   to TPAC

   Kaz mentioned if WebTV could meet with WoT IG at TPAC.

   (all are interested)

   Kaz will get back to the WoT IG and suggest we have a joint
   meeting between the Cloud Browser TF and the WoT IG.

   Colin asked in the concept of split browser could also be
   discussed with the TAG at TPAC. will get back to the WoT IG and
   suggest we have a joint meeting between the Cloud Browser TF
   and the WoT IG.

   Kaz will generate an agenda for the Web TV IG meeting

   No further items for discussion. So meeting closed. Meet again
   in 2 weeks.

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [9]scribe.perl version
    1.147 ([10]CVS log)
    $Date: 2016/08/17 15:52:44 $

      [9] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [10] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/