Ah, sorry Guiseppe about the name blunder. Will get back to you on spec outlines. Ingar 2015-01-23 9:54 GMT+01:00 Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Ingar Mæhlum Arntzen < > ingar.arntzen@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi Pascale >> >> > Giuseppe ;) > > >> Thank you. >> >> We will shortly go ahead and suggest a Community Group with goals >> reflecting your recommendations here. >> >> We will get back to the IG for comments once we have a draft for the >> charter. >> > > Great, thanks. Please also keep this group informed from time to time on > the progress made on the spec drafting. > > cheers, > /g > > >> >> Best, >> >> Ingar >> >> >> 2015-01-20 13:51 GMT+01:00 Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>: >> >>> Given that use cases and requirements have been discussed more then >>> enough in this group, I would say go ahead drafting a initial proposal of >>> such extension spec (to HTML5) would look like and we could gather feedback >>> on that. >>> >>> For the first round of comments we probably don't need an accurate spec >>> but something simpler which highlight the main concept of a "future" spec. >>> >>> I need to point out that this group is not chartered to work on >>> technical specifications, so I think starting a CG could be the best option >>> to move this forward, unless other people have a better suggestions. >>> >>> As you know, CG don't need any official approval, so you can just go >>> ahead and create one, and inform this group (and others) about it so that >>> anyone interested can join. >>> >>> cheers, >>> /g >>> >>> >> >
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 09:02:21 UTC