Re: [apis] Gap analysis and NSD

Thanks Giuseppe. That's what I meant with "x" but I think "?" is more
understandable.

Daniel

On 16/10/13 20:22, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
> One more comment: I'm adding some "?" cells. With that I mean basically
> two things
> 
> - the spec could be applicable, more investigation is needed
> - the spec could be applicable and clarification on the req. is needed
> to confirm this
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com
> <mailto:giuseppep@opera.com>> wrote:
> 
>     for the record: I'll not be able to attend todays call but I'm
>     putting some comments and an additional column in the document. I
>     would appreciate if you can look at them (if any of them is not
>     clear, you can skip it, but some are easy to address)
> 
> 
>     On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Giuseppe Pascale
>     <giuseppep@opera.com <mailto:giuseppep@opera.com>> wrote:
> 
>         good work, I would encourage others to provide their input on
>         that table.
> 
>         @Daniel
>         I've added some colors to your cells to make it easier to see
>         the covered/not covered/undefined
> 
>         @TF moderators
>         is this table linked from the wiki? if not, would you mind
>         adding a link to it  somewhere?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Daniel Davis <ddavis@w3.org
>         <mailto:ddavis@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
>             Thanks for this, Giuseppe.
> 
>             I've indicated what I think the NSD API covers in our
>             spreadsheet:
>             https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvACjV6qSvmxdEctdjYwa2JOalZLOG10elE1LVRZNlE#gid=1
> 
>             ✓ = covered
>             ⨯ = not covered, could be added
>             (blank) = not applicable
> 
>             I've also added columns for what I think are relevant specs
>             for the
>             whole gap analysis. We can change or delete them as necessary.
> 
>             Cheers,
>             Daniel
> 
>             On 05/10/13 17:20, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
>             > Hi all,
>             > as discussed during last Media APIs TF call, we are now
>             moving on to the
>             > next (final) phase of our work for the current iteration:
>             the gap analysis.
>             >
>             > In this phase, we need to analyse existing specs and see
>             if there are
>             > technologies that already satisfy the requirements we have
>             listed in [1]
>             > (extracted from the use cases in [2])
>             >
>             > So there is an action point on each TF member to come up
>             with suggestion
>             > of which specs can be used to address our requirements or
>             which specs
>             > would need to be "extended" in order to meet our
>             requirements. Please
>             > send an email to this list including:
>             >
>             > 1. requirement
>             > 2. related spec
>             > 3. identified gaps (if any)
>             >
>             > Since we have already mentioned the NSD spec [3] few
>             times, I would like
>             > to ask people to start reviewing it (as also requested by
>             the DAP group)
>             > and provide feedback on if such spec address the
>             identified requirements
>             > on service/device discovery, and if not, why. (I'll
>             provide my comments
>             > on this in a separate mail)
>             >
>             > /g
>             >
>             > P.S. During the call we decided to try to get feedback on
>             a voluntary
>             > base, but if nobody volunteers we may need to fall back on
>             assigning
>             > each requirement to one TF member during next call ;)
>             >
>             > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Requirements
>             > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Use_Cases
>             > [3]
>             https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/discovery-api/Overview.html
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 13:04:58 UTC