On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Vickers, Mark <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:28 PM, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I still don't quite follow. >> >> We've come up with a set of requirements that are all good and fine >> and that are also underlying principles of how the the new charter was >> written. >> >> We're in a situation where a charter has been proposed - not in one >> where we need to provide input on how to write one and what strategies >> it should follow.l > > Perhaps I'm confused (as usual), but I don't see a new TTWG Charter on my AC My Questionnaires page for my vote, so I was assuming this wasn't yet a final Staff proposal to the AC for a vote, but a draft that could take input. If it's a Staff proposal to the AC for a vote, then I agree with your point. > > Perhaps a Staff member can enlighten us? I think you are correct - it is not up for a vote yet and we are able to give input. But what I am trying to say is that this far we're not being very constructive in our input. Sorry for being unclear, Silvia.Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 02:19:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:57:16 UTC