Re: [apis] Media APIs TF teleconference tomorrow

Thanks for your understanding, Olivier.

Regarding my action item #127 (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/127), I've reviewed the use cases and found some missing scenario. I uploaded two addition use cases

UC10 on browser-to-non browser sync (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Use_Cases#10._.22Use_Case_Ten_.E2.80.93_Sync_Among_Browser-_and_non-Browser_Devices.22)

And UC11 on parental control (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Media_APIs/Use_Cases#11._.22Use_Case_Eleven_.E2.80.93_Parental_Control_in_Content_Access.22)

The UC11 in fact also prompted me to put an "X" on the Requirement table for UC5 Content Search. My thinking is that parental control would require search results be limited according to some criteria (content genre or ratings etc.) Perhaps this will result in a new requirement being generated. I suggest we tee it up for future meeting topic.


--------
Sheau Ng | NBCUniversal | P: 609.759.0819

On Aug 21, 2013, at 10:59 AM, "Olivier Thereaux" <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk<mailto:Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>> wrote:

Hi Sheau, no problem we suspected you had a conflict preventing you from attending.

Two things of interest:

1. There is an open action item for you to “Review use cases and requirements document, see whether there is any need for more use cases related to content sync” - https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/127 - did you have a chance to look into it? If so, a quick mail to the list would be appreciated.

2. We reviewed the Use Cases / Requirements table during the call, and there was one instance where the group wasn't sure about an "X" you seemed to think belonged: Use Case 5 (Content Search) and Requirement 20 (Media Content Protection). The group seemed to think that media content protection didn't really apply during the media search scenario. Of course it would apply later, if the user ends up playing the media, but that seems to not be key to the use case itself. If you have a chance to look into this and either clarify why you thought the requirement applied, or agree that it actually didn't…

More on this in today's meeting minutes:
http://www.w3.org/2013/08/21-webtv-minutes.html

Best,
Olivier



-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------