- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 08:34:06 -0700
- To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>, "GAUSMAN, PAUL" <pg2483@att.com>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+de+mG2CDKN7CxSXsazLJJHA4KDdaAp8V_bY35uesnxeQ@mail.gmail.com>
I was going to suggest something like this, but glad it has been proposed. I would suggest capitalizing Profile also, i.e., "Web Media Profile". On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>wrote: > On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:50:42 +0100, GAUSMAN, PAUL <pg2483@att.com> wrote: > > Why not: >> >> "Web Media profile" >> Guidelines for integration of interactive media services in a >> browser-based environment >> >> ...and point out the video stuff within the document structure. >> >> Sounds good to me as well. Anybody disagree? > > /g > > > Thanks! >> -Paul >> >> Q me >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Giuseppe Pascale [mailto:giuseppep@opera.com] >> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 3:00 AM >> To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org; david.corvoysier@orange.com; Robin Berjon >> Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title >> >> I'm not convinced about the world "platform", it seems to imply a lot more >> than what we are aiming too. >> And since guidelines it seems to be used in W3C for a type of documents >> that is different from our document I'll than propose to stick to >> "profile". >> >> Even though I agree with Robin that profile tend to generate bad feelings, >> at the end of the day a profile is what we are doing. >> And anyway I hope people will not judge the book from its cover. >> >> Finally, as a more generic alternative for TV I can propose media. >> >> So the title would be >> >> "Web Media profile" >> Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a >> browser-based environment >> >> If nobody disagree I'll use this. Hopefully we can have more discussions >> on other topics ;) >> >> /g >> >> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:27:47 +0100, <david.corvoysier@orange.com> wrote: >> >> I wouldn't argue too much on the exact wording unless it explicitly >>> states that the scope of the document is reduced to "resource-limited >>> devices", which is exactly what I want to avoid: the whole point of the >>> document is to improve interoperability, not to create yet another >>> target for service providers ... >>> >>> That said, the following Robin+giuseppe remix would suit me: >>> >>> "Web and TV platform" >>> Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a >>> browser-based environment >>> >>> David >>> >> >> >> > > -- > Giuseppe Pascale > TV & Connected Devices > Opera Software > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 15:34:58 UTC