- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:38:04 +0900
- To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
available at: http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-webtv-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking these minutes, Glenn! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Media Pipeline Task Force Teleconference 28 Jun 2012 [2]Agenda [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/Agenda_Telco_28th_June_2012 See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-webtv-irc Attendees Present Clarke, duncanr, ddorwin, markw, SethHodgson, nisc, Juhani, Kazuyuki, glenn, kstreeter, Franck, johnsim Regrets Chair clarke Scribe glenn Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Bug Review 2. [6]Requirements Document 3. [7]Adjournment * [8]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ Bug Review clarke: [9]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13359 ... please check out this bug activity [9] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13359 Requirements Document <inserted> [10]Juhani's comments on adaptive bit rate requirements [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-and-tv/2012Jun/0011.html juhani: comments around terminology ... not new reqs or use cases ... should we keep terms not used in doc? clarke: agrees no need to retain unused defs juhani: e.g., programme, media track, etc. ... some of these unused defs are questionable ... suggests new pan-definition for 'adaptive bit rate {streaming, content, media}' ... should have single def using consistent head term 'adaptive bit rate' ... suggests defs for 'no abr method preference' and 'open source browsers' clarke: agrees, will review and implement action clarke to review and implement changes to terminology related to ABR in reqs document <trackbot> Created ACTION-99 - Review and implement changes to terminology related to ABR in reqs document [on Clarke Stevens - due 2012-07-05]. <inserted> [11]Juhani's comments on content protection requirements [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-and-tv/2012Jun/0012.html juhani: further comments about terminology in CP reqs document ... in particular, confusion about distinction between 'content protection {method,system,solution}' ... proposes to use either/or formulation <inserted> [12]Requirements for Content Protection [12] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webtv/raw-file/tip/mpreq/MPTF-CP-Requirements.html ddorwin: 4.1.4 says system but should be solution... clarke: don't need to make reqs on implementations, do we? ddorwin: 'system' is misleading w.r.t. applicability to implementation or spec <ddorwin> 4.1.10: This sounds like a container requirement, which I don't think is necessary. ddorwin: 4.1.10 sounds like a container req <ddorwin> 4.1.11: Is "determine from the media stream" correct? Again, this is also a requirement on containers. FYI, I don't think ISO CENC does this. <ddorwin> 4.1.12: " determine from the media stream" doesn't make sense for errors. <ddorwin> 4.1.13: Media Source is not an "element". <ddorwin> 4.2.1: What does "provision of tools" mean? <ddorwin> some are nits ddorwin: what does 'provision of tools' mean? ... thinking it means 'the specification provides tools/features...' clarke: 'provision of tools' probably should use different word than 'tools'; suggestions welcome ... please send comments ... believes the TF is near end of life; should transfer responsibility to ... ... suggests skipping meeting next week (5th) due to US holidays ... suggests final review of comments, then either shut down TF or go dormant ACTION clarke to send feedback on these review comments <trackbot> Created ACTION-100 - Send feedback on these review comments [on Clarke Stevens - due 2012-07-05]. Adjournment adjourned Summary of Action Items <trackbot> Created ACTION-99 - Review and implement changes to terminology related to ABR in reqs document [on Clarke Stevens - due 2012-07-05]. <trackbot> Created ACTION-100 - Send feedback on these review comments [on Clarke Stevens - due 2012-07-05]. [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [13]scribe.perl version 1.136 ([14]CVS log) $Date: 2012/06/28 15:35:45 $ [13] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 15:40:15 UTC