- From: Mays, David <David_Mays@Comcast.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:38:50 +0000
- To: Clarke Stevens <c.stevens@cablelabs.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
I agree there is little to no reason to keep it. Dave ________________________________________ From: Clarke Stevens [C.Stevens@cablelabs.com] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:46 AM To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org Subject: [MEDIA_PIPELINE_TF] Need for CT2? At the end of last week's meeting, it seems we were coming to the conclusion that use case "CT2" is not necessary. Here's a link for your convenience: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/ADR_Minimal_Control_Model_Proposal#U se_Cases Please speak up if you feel this use case is required and please provide some justification. The current consensus appears to be that the best quality segment for the available bandwidth will likely be chosen anyway, so the requirement is superfluous. Also, there is nothing preventing the user agent from implementing CT2 without any change necessary. -Clarke
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 09:40:07 UTC