- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:45:36 -0700
- To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+ePvtjAmfq3XQB3L93F58-B6WDvxQ-mMqwy6eppTnX9Xw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:10:56 +0100, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com >> >wrote: >> >> >>> Now there is some text in the DOM3 spec >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-****Level-3-Events/<http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-**Level-3-Events/> >>> <http://www.w3.**org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/<http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/> >>> > >>> >>> >>> but AFAIK nobody has implemented it yet. >>> >> >> >> which text are you referring to in terms of implementing? >> > > I mean the "TV related" parts. > > There is a section on remote controllers that is clearly just a place > holder > http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-**Level-3-Events/#remote-control<http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#remote-control> > > (see the "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet" part, that text should be removed > anyway) > I reported this to Doug today. > > Plus the TV related keys in this list > http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-**Level-3-Events/#key-values<http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#key-values> > > I remember this was discussed briefly here and I think you provided some > input on this list (and I guess somewhere else) but I'm not sure if there > is any actual plan to support them as defined in that document by any major > browser (or even minor for what matters) or if these parts are still a work > in progress. > Yes, I provided a list of the RC events defined/used by a number of different standards/specifications. The more interesting question (than simply scoping this to "major browser[s]") is what is supported by "device browsers" where the device provides a RC. I'm not sure that support by browsers predominantly used on devices that *do not* employ a RC is particularly relevant. > (Note: I haven't done a review myself, I was hoping we can do it as part > of this activity and provide feedbacks to relevant groups). I agree that such review and feedback would be useful as part of this activity.
Received on Friday, 20 January 2012 16:46:30 UTC