- From: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:52:50 +0000
- To: Masahito Kawamori <masahito.kawamori@ties.itu.int>
- Cc: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>, Jan Lindquist <jan.lindquist@ericsson.com>, "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
On 8 Feb 2012, at 10:25, Masahito Kawamori wrote: > Giuseppe, all > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote: > [snip] >> >> Having read all the comments so far I still think the best compromise >> between different opinions is >> >> >> "Web and TV profile" >> Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a browser-based >> environment > > I agree. (but then again, the question may remain, "hasn't that been > the intention of HTML5 <video>?". Well, it is ok for the time being, > as a straw man, at least.) > Yes... for me the spec is more like a HTML5 profile for web applications on CE devices than anything to do with video services. >> >> possible variation >> >> "WebTV profile" >> >> Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a browser-based >> environment > > Would not probably work, as pointed out by Yusuke. > > Thanks. > > Masahito > > >> /g >> >> >>> Thanks, >>> mav >>> >>> >>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Jan Lindquist wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> The profile is not only about HTML5 but other W3c standards so it would >>>> be misleading to have HTML5 in the title. In the spirit of the IG how about >>>> "web and TV profile". The name of the profile is not as critical as knowing >>>> the breadth of the areas it should cover. This profile may live for a while >>>> and it in the context of the industry attempt to influence the work in W3C >>>> with a clear list of specs that are being used and how they may be used. It >>>> will become a reference point by other standard groups. By using the same >>>> name as the IG it can help see the relationship. >>>> Regards, >>>> JanL >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Vickers, Mark [mailto:Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com] >>>>> Sent: den 7 februari 2012 15:24 >>>>> To: Giuseppe Pascale >>>>> Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG >>>>> Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title >>>>> >>>>> How about "HTML5 Video Services Profile"? >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:26:40 +0100, Vickers, Mark >>>>> >>>>> <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 5. Title: The goal for me is a profile of HTML5 for video >>>>> >>>>> services. There are two differences with "Web&TV Profile". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - I want to include HTML5 in the title because this is >>>>> >>>>> HTML5-related >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and HTM5-centric >>>>>>> - I don't like including "TV". This continues to cause >>>>> >>>>> confusion. It is clearer to describe an HTML5 profile for >>>>> video services. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't have strong opinions on the title but I would note >>>>> >>>>> the following: >>>>>> >>>>>> - A title should be short ( the subtitle explains a bit >>>>> >>>>> more what we are doing). >>>>>> >>>>>> - I've tried to use the word "TV services" in the subtitle that is >>>>>> hopefully a bit less confusing (or maybe not?). I have defined this >>>>>> term as >>>>>> >>>>>> "For the purposes of this document a TV service is a >>>>> >>>>> commercial video service that may include elements of >>>>> interactivity and that provides a coherent user experience. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - while this profile is html5 based this is not only about >>>>> >>>>> html5. I'm not against highlighting the HTML5 centric >>>>> approach but I wouldn't call this "an html5 profile". >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So in short: I'm fine with your comments but I cannot come >>>>> >>>>> up with a better title/subtitle. Suggestions are welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> /g >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> See you on the call. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> mav >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One note: the zakim bridge is overbooked. >>>>>>>> So just in case we see that people have problem dialing >>>>> >>>>> in (in such >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> case please login on IRC and let us know) I set-up this >>>>> >>>>> Opera bridge. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NOTE: ONLY TO BE USED IF WE SEE THAT ZAKIM DOESN'T WORK >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Phone bridge details: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Conference ID: 33909 >>>>>>>> Start Date and Time: Monday 06.02.2012 17:00:00 CET/CEST >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bridge Numbers: >>>>>>>> Norway +47 23 69 26 03 >>>>>>>> USA +1 800 201 4229 (Toll-Free) >>>>>>>> Poland (Wroclaw) +48 71 719 6099 >>>>>>>> Poland (Warsaw) +48 22 262 0799 >>>>>>>> Japan +81 3 5435 8394 >>>>>>>> Russia +7 812 448 7876 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Conference Name: tv profile >>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> Please contact SysAdmin at +47 23 69 33 60 for assistance. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /g >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:06:15 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale >>>>> >>>>> <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here the call details for todays call >>>>>>>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Telco) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Schedule: Monday, 16:00Z (=8:00 Pacific, 11:00 Eastern, 17:00 >>>>>>>>> Europe, 01:00 Korea/Japan) >>>>>>>>> Phone: US: +1 617 761 6200 or SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org Conference >>>>>>>>> Code: 26632 IRC channel: #webtv >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And here the Agenda for todays call: >>>>>>>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Agenda_Telco_6/2/2012) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * Review of Charter >>>>>>>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Charter) >>>>>>>>> * Call schedule >>>>>>>>> * TF tools (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile) >>>>>>>>> * Process >>>>>>>>> * Initial feedbacks on the draft >>>>>>>>> (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webtv/raw-file/tip/tvprofile/tv.html) >>>>>>>>> * AOB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /g >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:00:59 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale >>>>> >>>>> <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> the poll [1] is now closed and the winner is... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Monday, February 6, 2012 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM UTC >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In this first call we will discuss the scope of the TV >>>>> >>>>> profile work, how do we want the group to be organized and >>>>> timeline (if any). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have any other topic you want to add to the >>>>> >>>>> agenda let me know. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll send around call details ASAP. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1] http://doodle.com/h6rfnkrqyi3uinpi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Giuseppe Pascale >>>>>>>> TV & Connected Devices >>>>>>>> Opera Software >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Giuseppe Pascale >>>>>> TV & Connected Devices >>>>>> Opera Software >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Giuseppe Pascale >> TV & Connected Devices >> Opera Software >> >
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 10:57:04 UTC