- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:08:08 +0100
- To: "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>, "Jan Lindquist" <jan.lindquist@ericsson.com>
- Cc: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Would one of the following title+subtitle address both needs?: "Web and TV profile" Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a browser-based environment "Web and TV guidelines" A profile of HTML5 and other web technologies for interactive video services /g On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:58:23 +0100, Jan Lindquist <jan.lindquist@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > The profile is not only about HTML5 but other W3c standards so it would > be misleading to have HTML5 in the title. In the spirit of the IG how > about "web and TV profile". The name of the profile is not as critical > as knowing the breadth of the areas it should cover. This profile may > live for a while and it in the context of the industry attempt to > influence the work in W3C with a clear list of specs that are being used > and how they may be used. It will become a reference point by other > standard groups. By using the same name as the IG it can help see the > relationship. > Regards, > JanL > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vickers, Mark [mailto:Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com] >> Sent: den 7 februari 2012 15:24 >> To: Giuseppe Pascale >> Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG >> Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title >> >> How about "HTML5 Video Services Profile"? >> >> On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:26:40 +0100, Vickers, Mark >> <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote: >> > >> >> 5. Title: The goal for me is a profile of HTML5 for video >> services. There are two differences with "Web&TV Profile". >> >> - I want to include HTML5 in the title because this is >> HTML5-related >> >> and HTM5-centric >> >> - I don't like including "TV". This continues to cause >> confusion. It is clearer to describe an HTML5 profile for >> video services. >> >> >> > >> > I don't have strong opinions on the title but I would note >> the following: >> > - A title should be short ( the subtitle explains a bit >> more what we are doing). >> > - I've tried to use the word "TV services" in the subtitle that is >> > hopefully a bit less confusing (or maybe not?). I have defined this >> > term as >> > >> > "For the purposes of this document a TV service is a >> commercial video service that may include elements of >> interactivity and that provides a coherent user experience. >> > >> > - while this profile is html5 based this is not only about >> html5. I'm not against highlighting the HTML5 centric >> approach but I wouldn't call this "an html5 profile". >> > >> > So in short: I'm fine with your comments but I cannot come >> up with a better title/subtitle. Suggestions are welcome. >> > >> > /g >> > >> > >> >> See you on the call. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> mav >> >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote: >> >> >> >>> One note: the zakim bridge is overbooked. >> >>> So just in case we see that people have problem dialing >> in (in such >> >>> case please login on IRC and let us know) I set-up this >> Opera bridge. >> >>> >> >>> NOTE: ONLY TO BE USED IF WE SEE THAT ZAKIM DOESN'T WORK >> >>> >> >>> Phone bridge details: >> >>> >> >>> Conference ID: 33909 >> >>> Start Date and Time: Monday 06.02.2012 17:00:00 CET/CEST >> >>> >> >>> Bridge Numbers: >> >>> Norway +47 23 69 26 03 >> >>> USA +1 800 201 4229 (Toll-Free) >> >>> Poland (Wroclaw) +48 71 719 6099 >> >>> Poland (Warsaw) +48 22 262 0799 >> >>> Japan +81 3 5435 8394 >> >>> Russia +7 812 448 7876 >> >>> >> >>> Conference Name: tv profile >> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >> >>> Please contact SysAdmin at +47 23 69 33 60 for assistance. >> >>> >> >>> /g >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:06:15 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale >> <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Here the call details for todays call >> >>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Telco) >> >>>> >> >>>> Schedule: Monday, 16:00Z (=8:00 Pacific, 11:00 Eastern, 17:00 >> >>>> Europe, 01:00 Korea/Japan) >> >>>> Phone: US: +1 617 761 6200 or SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org Conference >> >>>> Code: 26632 IRC channel: #webtv >> >>>> >> >>>> And here the Agenda for todays call: >> >>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Agenda_Telco_6/2/2012) >> >>>> >> >>>> * Review of Charter >> >>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Charter) >> >>>> * Call schedule >> >>>> * TF tools (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile) >> >>>> * Process >> >>>> * Initial feedbacks on the draft >> >>>> (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webtv/raw-file/tip/tvprofile/tv.html) >> >>>> * AOB >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> /g >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:00:59 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale >> <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi all, >> >>>>> the poll [1] is now closed and the winner is... >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Monday, February 6, 2012 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM UTC >> >>>>> >> >>>>> In this first call we will discuss the scope of the TV >> profile work, how do we want the group to be organized and >> timeline (if any). >> >>>>> If you have any other topic you want to add to the >> agenda let me know. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I'll send around call details ASAP. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> [1] http://doodle.com/h6rfnkrqyi3uinpi >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Giuseppe Pascale >> >>> TV & Connected Devices >> >>> Opera Software >> >>> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Giuseppe Pascale >> > TV & Connected Devices >> > Opera Software >> >> -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 15:11:37 UTC