Re: HNTF requirement document ready for publication

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:52:13 +0100, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>  
wrote:
>
> Regarding the style, I've just found the current HTML version uses
> "ReSpec.js" and dynamically generate the style.  If there is agreement
> to go for that direction (=using ReSpec.js instead of XMLSpec or
> directly editing HTML) within the IG, we don't have to follow all
> the guidelines.
>
> Please see also the discussion on the Chairs list [3] (member-only)
> about ReSpec.js.
>
indeed. AFAIK Respec is fine to use.
I don't think is an IG decision which tool to use and I doubt IG members  
have strong feelings about which tool is used anyway.

/g



> [3]  
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2011JulSep/thread.html#msg105
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kazuyuki
>
>
>> Francois and myself are happy to help you modify the document based on
>> the checkers and the guideline if needed.
>>
>> [1] Pubrules checker:
>> http://services.w3.org/xslt?xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.w3.org%2Ftidy%2Ftidy%3FpassThroughXHTML%3D1%26docAddr%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fdvcs.w3.org%252Fhg%252Fwebtv%252Fraw-file%252Fed956fac0f9c%252Fhnreq%252Fhnreq.html&xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fservices.w3.org%2Fxslt%3Fxmlfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F07%2Fpubrules%253Fuimode%253Dchecker_full%2526year%253D2010%2526docstatus%253Dfpig-note-tr%2526rectrack%253Dno%2526prevrec%253Ddoesnotapply%2526patpol%253Dw3c%2526normative%253Ddoesnotapply%2526uri%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fdvcs.w3.org%25252Fhg%25252Fwebtv%25252Fraw-file%25252Fed956fac0f9c%25252Fhnreq%25252Fhnreq.html%2526filterValues%253Dform%2526nscheckmanual%253D%2526display%253Dall%2526recursive%253Doff%2526recurse_auth%253Don%26xslfile%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2F09%2Fchecker%2Fframe.xsl%26display%3Dall%26recurse_auth%3Don&uimode=checker_full&filterValues=form&year=2010&docstatus=fpig-note-tr&rectrack=no&prevrec=doesnotapply&patpol=w3c&normative=doesnotappl!
 y&
> do
>> c_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdvcs.w3.org%2Fhg%2Fwebtv%2Fraw-file%2Fed956fac0f9c%2Fhnreq%2Fhnreq.html&recursive=off&nscheckmanual=&display=all&recurse_auth=on
>>
>> [2] Manual of Style: http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#References
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kazuyuki
>>
>>
>> On 11/24/2011 01:04 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> the hntf requirement document is ready for publication as a group note.
>>>
>>> While turning it into a proper W3C document together with Francois  
>>> (thanks for the help!),
>>> we did some small changes, fixed some typos and few other things that  
>>> didn't look right.
>>>
>>> So I would like to give the group the opportunity to check such  
>>> changes.
>>> The latest version of the document is available here:
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webtv/raw-file/ed956fac0f9c/hnreq/hnreq.html
>>>
>>> A diff version with some changes highlighted is available here:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fdvcs.w3.org%2Fhg%2Fwebtv%2Fraw-file%2F4831cdba407b%2Fhnreq%2Fhnreq.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdvcs.w3.org%2Fhg%2Fwebtv%2Fraw-file%2Fed956fac0f9c%2Fhnreq%2Fhnreq.html
>>>
>>> The diff does not show all changes, in particular other changes  
>>> applied to the document are:
>>> 1. a dependency in U4 that doesn't exist anymore was dropped.
>>> 2. a reference to UPnP Precision Time Synchronization in U13 was moved  
>>> back to the v3 since I couldn't find a v4 of AV transport spec that  
>>> could be linked directly.
>>> 3. the abstract is now limited to its last paragraph.
>>> 4. Updated the Status of This Document section, both boilerplate and  
>>> non boilerplate parts.
>>> 5. RFC 2119 words highlighted.
>>> 6. adapted the format for some of the use cases, not to go too deep in  
>>> nested lists.
>>>
>>> Deadline for comments is end of Monday next week (28th). We aim to  
>>> publish it on the 1st of December and share it with the DAP group for  
>>> comments after that.
>>>
>>> /g
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Giuseppe Pascale
TV & Connected Devices
Opera Software

Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 07:15:59 UTC