- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:09:43 +0200
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>, "Matt Hammond" <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Hi Matt, thanks for the text proposal. So including Dan comment it would read: "A "programme" or "content item" comprises a single period of audio visual content. It is usually expected to be labelled in content directories or television programme guides as a single entity. This might include an episode of a television programme, a radio programme, or a movie." I'm not sure we need to say "or content item"; it seems to me that this would introduce some confusion. I'm also not sure how this relates to audio only content. I guess a song or an album is not a "programme" according to this definition even though for some usecases a "movie" and a "song/album" are equivalent. What do you think? /g On Tue, 31 May 2011 17:43:24 +0200, Matt Hammond <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Tue, 31 May 2011 16:33:09 +0100, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> > wrote: > >> On 31 May 2011 17:22, Matt Hammond <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote: >>> As suggested in the conference call, here is a suggestion for an >>> improved >>> definition of 'programme' for the requirements document: >>> >>> A programme or content comprises a single period of audio visual >>> content. >> >> Do you mean "or content item" here? "Content" is usually a mass noun >> in these discussions, isn't it? > > "Content item" does seem more accurate. > >>> It is usually expected to be labelled in content directories or >>> television >>> programme guides as a single entity. This might include an episode of a >>> television programme, a radio programme, or a movie. >>> >>> Comments are welcome. >> >> Sounds ok to me. Does it fit also with >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/programmes/2009-09-07.shtml#Programme >> as far as you know? > > That is a minefield :-) My intention with this definition is probably > closest to po:broadcast or po:episode. As far as I can tell, none of the > use cases so far seem to show any need (yet) to distinuish which of > these two it is. > > regards > > > > Matt -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software - Sweden
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 17:10:26 UTC