- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:57:20 +0200
- To: "Jean-Claude Dufourd" <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Cc: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Hi JC, during last call we touched on two of your usecases Service Migration (ISSUE-7) and Document Migration (ISSUE-15). There were some comments from several participants that would require some actions from you. I'll try to summarize the main issues here so you can act on them. (I would like to ask everybody to point out in case I fail to list all the pointed out issues) - for both usecases (and actually for all of them) would be better to use the word "application" rather then document (see also related discussion on the list) Since I'm going to add a definition of application, basically similar to the html5 definition of document, you don't need to clarify in your usecase the term. - for ISSUE-7 (and in general for any usecase you or anyone else will provide) would be better to provide a more detailed description of one particular scenario you have in mind with the steps that the user would have to do to cover that particular use case. So would be good if you could do for ISSUE-7 what you have done for ISSUE-15 (i.e. step by step description). You have actually called it "implementation" but I think that as far as you don't mention any specific technology (if not part of the use case of course) that can be safely part of the description itself. Furthermore someone was concerned about the particular example you make since it was not clear how a moving service could still work when it is highly dependent from a platform capability. So if you could provide a more detailed, step by step, usecase that would be great. - as also captured in the notes for ISSUE-15, the are 2 possible sub usecases that can be considered here, one that involve a web server and one that it does not (widget). Since it seems that what you are looking at is the second one (widget) is probably better to make this explicit. Generic comment: we decided to split the requirement document into high level usecases and low level usecases. I think I have a pretty good understanding of the high level usecases (based on the discussion so far) so I will try to list them into the requirement document myself (then people can review it). Would be better then from now on if we focus on more specific and user centric usecase, like it could be your "voting" example since different services may imply very different requirements for a specification to cover. /g -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software - Sweden
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 16:00:14 UTC