- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:18:34 +0200
- To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org, "Jean-Claude Dufourd" <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>
Hi JC, does this mean that ISSUE-6 (service Provider) and ISSUE-7 (Service Migration) can be actually closed since they are now replaced by ISSUE-13, ISSUE-14,ISSUE-15 ? Let me know, so I can update the wiki and tracker accordingly. I'm also going to send out some comment in a separate email. /g On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:27:24 +0200, Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have added to the discussion on implementation alternatives [1] a > possible implementation of ISSUE-7, ISSUE-8 and ISSUE-15 > As I mentioned in the last call, no new technology is needed, just reuse > of discovery and definition of a specific service at the UA level. > Best regards > JC > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Discussions/Alternatives#Solution_1.2:_Structured_Object_API > -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software - Sweden
Received on Monday, 23 May 2011 15:21:17 UTC