Re: [MEDIA_PIPELINE_TF] Content protection proposal

I'm starting my final edits now and will send in the proposals shortly.
Last call for changes or comments.

-Clarke

On 12/15/11 9:19 PM, "Mays, David" <David_Mays@comcast.com> wrote:

>I'm ok with the changes. Did you submit yet?
>
>Dave
>
>________________________________________
>From: Clarke Stevens [C.Stevens@CableLabs.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:08 PM
>To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG
>Subject: Re: [MEDIA_PIPELINE_TF] Content protection proposal
>
>Although we have not really had a chance to review it as a group, I am
>considering providing Mark Watson's content protection proposal as
>feedback to the HTML WG in addition to the HTML Errors and ABR Minimal
>Control proposals.
>
>My motivation is that same as that for the ABR Minimal Control proposal.
>It is a useful and well-considered proposal that may require some
>modification, but it provides a basis for discussion and a path for
>inclusion in HTML5.
>
>In other words, our feedback on LC Bugs 13625 and 12399 that is due today
>would include HTML Errors, ABR Minimal Control and Netflix Content
>Protection:
>
>http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/HTML_Error_codes
>http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/ADR_Minimal_Control_Model_Proposal
>http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/Netflix_Content_Protection
>
>I plan to send this feedback to HTML WG this evening after people have
>had a chance to comment, edit, etc.
>
>Let me know what you think.
>
>Thanks,
>-Clarke
>
>P.S. For your convenience, here are the links to the relevant bugs:
>
>https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13625
>https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12399
>
>