- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:22:34 +0900
- To: TV and WEB <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
forwarding to archive with proper ISSUE ID (ISSUE-37) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [MEDIA_PIPELINE_TF] ISSUE-34: ViewPort-Support Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:00:04 +0000 Resent-From: public-web-and-tv@w3.org Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:59:33 +0200 From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> Organization: Telecom ParisTech To: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com> CC: public-web-and-tv@w3.org Hi Scott, Le 10/08/2011 14:15, Scott Wilson a écrit : > Well, right now you could use a<track> pointing to an SVG file if you wanted to. I don't think thats a significant restriction. > > The real question is - will browsers implement support for SVG documents linked in<track> elements, or just WebVTT/Subrip formatted synchronized text files? That's a good question. Given that they all implement SVG, including animations, I don't think it would be too hard to implement for them. But it's a guess. > > And what about SMIL[1]? That's a different beast. Not supported natively by browsers, even if theoretically it could be used. There would be several other formats (3GPP/Quicktime Timed Text [http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/26245.htm], ...). -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.wp.institut-telecom.fr/
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 21:22:10 UTC