- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:20:23 +0900
- To: TV and WEB <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
forwarding to archive with proper ISSUE ID (ISSUE-37) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [MEDIA_PIPELINE_TF] ISSUE-34: ViewPort-Support Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:46:57 +0000 Resent-From: public-web-and-tv@w3.org Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:46:09 +1000 From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> To: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> CC: public-web-and-tv@w3.org On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote: > Hi Sylvia, > > Le 10/08/2011 02:38, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : >> >> I wonder if instead it might be worth analysing if we can come up with >> a<track> kind that allows overlaying hyperlinkable regions onto the >> video? > > Why wouldn't it be possible to have a track element point to some animated > SVG file? The <track> element points to timed text, i.e. to a file that provides text fragments along the timeline of the video. SVG is not suitable for that use. Just like you cannot put a SVG into a <audio> or <video> element, you won't be able to put a SVG into a <track> element. However, we can e.g. create a WebVTT file with data in the cues that point to SVG files or whatever else we want to time-align with the video and link that in the <track> @src with @kind=metadata. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 21:19:58 UTC