- From: Matt Hammond <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:51:28 +0100
- To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
- Cc: "Kazuyuki Ashimura" <ashimura@w3.org>
Hi,
I have updated the description for ISSUE-20 (ACTION-56) to include the
recommendations made during the last conference call.
In light of the rewrite of this issue and the discussions, I believe
ACTION-41 is no longer applicable.
http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Discussions/TVControl
http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/56
http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/41
regards
Matt
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:44:56 +0100, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Thanks a lot for your updating the description for ISSUE-20.
>
> I just wanted to mention the URI of the issue description is:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Discussions/TVControl
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kazuyuki
>
>
> On 07/19/2011 10:11 PM, Matt Hammond wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have rewritten issue 20 ("TV Control") to try to better address
>> concerns raised - in particular a desire for the intent behind the use
>> case be more explicitly addressed.
>>
>> Specifically, the issue now focuses on the underlying concern, which I
>> addressed in a previous email, that the development of web applications
>> would benefit from a higher level of abstraction for some television
>> centric tasks. The scenarios illustrate how an API providing a higher
>> level of abstraction might be used to achieve them.
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>> Matt
>
--
| Matt Hammond
| Research Engineer, BBC R&D, Centre House, London
| http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 09:52:03 UTC