- From: Matt Hammond <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:51:28 +0100
- To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
- Cc: "Kazuyuki Ashimura" <ashimura@w3.org>
Hi, I have updated the description for ISSUE-20 (ACTION-56) to include the recommendations made during the last conference call. In light of the rewrite of this issue and the discussions, I believe ACTION-41 is no longer applicable. http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Discussions/TVControl http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/56 http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/41 regards Matt On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:44:56 +0100, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Thanks a lot for your updating the description for ISSUE-20. > > I just wanted to mention the URI of the issue description is: > http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Discussions/TVControl > > Thanks, > > Kazuyuki > > > On 07/19/2011 10:11 PM, Matt Hammond wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have rewritten issue 20 ("TV Control") to try to better address >> concerns raised - in particular a desire for the intent behind the use >> case be more explicitly addressed. >> >> Specifically, the issue now focuses on the underlying concern, which I >> addressed in a previous email, that the development of web applications >> would benefit from a higher level of abstraction for some television >> centric tasks. The scenarios illustrate how an API providing a higher >> level of abstraction might be used to achieve them. >> >> regards >> >> >> Matt > -- | Matt Hammond | Research Engineer, BBC R&D, Centre House, London | http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 09:52:03 UTC