- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:58:50 +0200
- To: "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com>, "Dave Raggett" <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: "Mark Watson" <watsonm@netflix.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:52:33 +0200, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: >> The question remains whether it is necessary or useful to define >> higher level abstraction layers, e.g., a low-level, generic UPnP >> layer, UPnP service specific layers, etc. > > Quite so. This could come later based upon experience by library > developers with exploring various approaches to defining overarching > abstractions. > Indeed, this is my opinion as well, that is not giving up on a higher level API, but starting from a "simpler" one and experiment on top of it with JS libraries. Then consider an higher level API, if this is felt as needed, at a second stage. -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software - Sweden
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2011 14:59:53 UTC