RE: IG charter: status and schedule

Dear Funahashi-san and HyeonJae,

We share the view that video service over IP network is in-scope of this IG, since participants of the workshop were interested in it. In terms of the priority issue, it is exactly what IG should discuss.

If no objection, I suggest just to describe the meaning of "TV services". For example, 

TV services means audio-visual contents delivery services via IP network and out-of-band channel such as terrestrial/satellite/CABLE broadcasting.

Best regards,

-***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***--***---***---***-
Tatsuya Igarashi　(Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com)
NS Development Dept. Technology Development Group
Sony Corporation
(Voice) +81-3-5435-3252　(Fax) +81-3-5435-3274 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of FUNAHASHI Yosuke
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:53 PM
> To: 이현재
> Cc: 'Kazuyuki Ashimura'; 'Charles McCathieNevile';
> public-web-and-tv@w3.org
> Subject: Re: IG charter: status and schedule
> 
> Hi HyeonJae,
> 
> Thank you for your comment.
> 
> I think IPTV telcos are interested in this activity.  The reasons are
> 1) Open IPTV Forum, IPTV Forum Japan, Ericsson and NTT actively
> participated in the workshop, 2) one of the candidate chairs Kawamori-
> san belongs to NTT.
> 
> Above all, I would not like to exclude intentionally any individual
> service from our scope before the IG started or before our
> comprehensive examination about existing services.  This is a reason
> why I expressed my preference to keep the meaning of "the TV services"
> and "Web and TV" somewhat abstract level in the reply to Igarashi-
> san.  I know this abstractness has some risk in attracting
> "appropriate" organization in related domain.  But what is
> "appropriate" is also a vague notion for us now.
> 
> Regards,
> Yosuke
> 
> 
> On 2010/09/30, at 12:08, 이현재 wrote:
> 
> > Welcome Igarashi san,
> > We could share TV makers voice with other industries.
> >
> > WebonTV Discussion at Tokyo has discussed wide range of spectrum as
> > you
> > listed.
> > I suggest IPTV service should be later discussed at W3C because IPTV
> > telco
> > is not as much interested in W3C as WebonTV participants.
> > "Video services via IP network" could be defined narrow and precise
> > term as
> > online video distribution from contents providers such as Netflix,
> > Amazon,
> > Hulu and Broadcasters such as NHK, BBC, KBS, ZDF and possible 3rd
> > party
> > small individual/independent content providers via open unmanaged
> > internet
> > to TV devices and TV-like devices like STB, Blu-Ray, etc.
> > By definition it could include managed IPTV too, however, as I
> > mentioned
> > earlier 1st priority at W3C will be open unmanaged internet.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > HJ
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > Sent: 없음
> > To: Kazuyuki Ashimura; FUNAHASHI Yosuke; Charles McCathieNevile
> > Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: IG charter: status and schedule
> >
> > Dear folks,
> >
> > Thank you for drafting the IG charter.
> >
> > I think that we should clarify what "TV services" means in order to
> > avoid
> > leading confusions.
> > I think that teleco's IPTV services and on-line services over the
> > Internet
> > are in scope of the IG. If "TV services" means just video contents
> > delivery
> > via terrestrial/satellite/CABLE broadcast, i.e. out-of-band of IP, we
> > should also describe "video services via IP network" as well as "TV
> > service".
> >
> > Any comment?
> >
> >
> -***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***--***---***---***-
> > Tatsuya Igarashi　(Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com)
> > NS Development Dept. Technology Development Group
> > Sony Corporation
> > (Voice) +81-3-5435-3252　(Fax) +81-3-5435-3274
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org
> >> [mailto:public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kazuyuki
> >> Ashimura
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:55 AM
> >> To: FUNAHASHI Yosuke
> >> Cc: Charles McCathieNevile; public-web-and-tv@w3.org
> >> Subject: Re: IG charter: status and schedule
> >>
> >> Hi Yosuke,
> >>
> >> I think it's my bad it took 12 hours to install Charles' updated
> >> draft...  Please refer to the updated draft charter [1] for your
> >> detailed review.
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/09/webTVIGcharter.html

> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Kazuyuki
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/30/2010 02:44 AM, FUNAHASHI Yosuke wrote:
> >>> Hi Charles,
> >>>
> >>>> I suppose we need a little rule or discipline regarding the
> >>>> discussions on the IG in order for participants to carry their
> >>>> attention to the ongoing process cooperatively. I think we should
> >>>> explicitly show them the rule before they participate. I do not
> >>>> know
> >>>> whether the charter is appropriate or not as the place where we
> >>>> write
> >>>> down such matters.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Oh. You already included a comment about this topic in your updated
> >>> charter.
> >>> I appreciate your thoughtful update.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Yosuke
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kazuyuki Ashimura / W3C Multimodal & Voice Activity Lead
> >> mailto: ashimura@w3.org
> >> voice: +81.466.49.1170 / fax: +81.466.49.1171
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:44:29 UTC