Re: IG charter: status and schedule

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:46:09 +0200, Masahito Kawamori  
<masahito.kawamori@ties.itu.int> wrote:

> Hi Chaals
>
> Thank you for your reply and explanation. I see your points. Maybe we
> can word the charter to clearly express your points.

Yes, I'll look at what Funahashi-san did and see how we can make it  
clearer.

> By the way, I noticed something about the text of the draft charter.
> In the "External Groups" clause, ITU-T is put under "TV Industry". ITU
> (International Telecommunication Union) is a UN agency for
> Telecommunication; it is not in TV Industry.
> It should be put under "Telecommunication".

Yep. Alternatively there is the way Funahashi-san wrote it, just listing  
some relevant organisations without classifying them. Do you (or does  
anyone else) have a preference for one style or the other?

> I also notice that there are not many broadcast-related organizations
> listed here. Since there have already been some (regional)
> organizations that already have some web-related standards for
> broadcasting, I think it would be better to include them.
>
> Organizations relevant to broadcasting are:
>
> ARIB (with its BML)
> ATSC (with its ACAP-X)
> DVB (with its DVB-HTML)
>
> We also need to include
> CEA

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com

Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 16:54:07 UTC