RE: IG charter: status and schedule

Dear all,

For the scoping, we need to dive a little bit deeper than current general
term, in that I agree with Igarashi-san adding a few definitions and major
usecases. This will definitely help potential participant understand W3C
web and tv work scope. sometimes general term may lower industry interest
and be in danger of being neglected. We could open additional scope
possibilities while working though.

Best regards,
HJ

-----Original Message-----
From: 
Sent: 없음
To: FUNAHASHI Yosuke; 이현재
Cc: 'Kazuyuki Ashimura'; 'Charles McCathieNevile'; public-web-and-tv@w3.org
Subject: RE: IG charter: status and schedule

Dear Funahashi-san and HyeonJae,

We share the view that video service over IP network is in-scope of this
IG, since participants of the workshop were interested in it. In terms of
the priority issue, it is exactly what IG should discuss.

If no objection, I suggest just to describe the meaning of "TV services".
For example, 

TV services means audio-visual contents delivery services via IP network
and out-of-band channel such as terrestrial/satellite/CABLE broadcasting.

Best regards,

-***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***--***---***---***-
Tatsuya Igarashi　(Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com)
NS Development Dept. Technology Development Group
Sony Corporation
(Voice) +81-3-5435-3252　(Fax) +81-3-5435-3274 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of FUNAHASHI Yosuke
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:53 PM
> To: 이현재
> Cc: 'Kazuyuki Ashimura'; 'Charles McCathieNevile';
> public-web-and-tv@w3.org
> Subject: Re: IG charter: status and schedule
> 
> Hi HyeonJae,
> 
> Thank you for your comment.
> 
> I think IPTV telcos are interested in this activity.  The reasons are
> 1) Open IPTV Forum, IPTV Forum Japan, Ericsson and NTT actively
> participated in the workshop, 2) one of the candidate chairs Kawamori-
> san belongs to NTT.
> 
> Above all, I would not like to exclude intentionally any individual
> service from our scope before the IG started or before our
> comprehensive examination about existing services.  This is a reason
> why I expressed my preference to keep the meaning of "the TV services"
> and "Web and TV" somewhat abstract level in the reply to Igarashi-
> san.  I know this abstractness has some risk in attracting
> "appropriate" organization in related domain.  But what is
> "appropriate" is also a vague notion for us now.
> 
> Regards,
> Yosuke
> 
> 
> On 2010/09/30, at 12:08, 이현재 wrote:
> 
> > Welcome Igarashi san,
> > We could share TV makers voice with other industries.
> >
> > WebonTV Discussion at Tokyo has discussed wide range of spectrum as
> > you
> > listed.
> > I suggest IPTV service should be later discussed at W3C because IPTV
> > telco
> > is not as much interested in W3C as WebonTV participants.
> > "Video services via IP network" could be defined narrow and precise
> > term as
> > online video distribution from contents providers such as Netflix,
> > Amazon,
> > Hulu and Broadcasters such as NHK, BBC, KBS, ZDF and possible 3rd
> > party
> > small individual/independent content providers via open unmanaged
> > internet
> > to TV devices and TV-like devices like STB, Blu-Ray, etc.
> > By definition it could include managed IPTV too, however, as I
> > mentioned
> > earlier 1st priority at W3C will be open unmanaged internet.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > HJ
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > Sent: 없음
> > To: Kazuyuki Ashimura; FUNAHASHI Yosuke; Charles McCathieNevile
> > Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: IG charter: status and schedule
> >
> > Dear folks,
> >
> > Thank you for drafting the IG charter.
> >
> > I think that we should clarify what "TV services" means in order to
> > avoid
> > leading confusions.
> > I think that teleco's IPTV services and on-line services over the
> > Internet
> > are in scope of the IG. If "TV services" means just video contents
> > delivery
> > via terrestrial/satellite/CABLE broadcast, i.e. out-of-band of IP, we
> > should also describe "video services via IP network" as well as "TV
> > service".
> >
> > Any comment?
> >
> >
> -***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***--***---***---***-
> > Tatsuya Igarashi　(Tatsuya.Igarashi@jp.sony.com)
> > NS Development Dept. Technology Development Group
> > Sony Corporation
> > (Voice) +81-3-5435-3252　(Fax) +81-3-5435-3274
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org
> >> [mailto:public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kazuyuki
> >> Ashimura
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:55 AM
> >> To: FUNAHASHI Yosuke
> >> Cc: Charles McCathieNevile; public-web-and-tv@w3.org
> >> Subject: Re: IG charter: status and schedule
> >>
> >> Hi Yosuke,
> >>
> >> I think it's my bad it took 12 hours to install Charles' updated
> >> draft...  Please refer to the updated draft charter [1] for your
> >> detailed review.
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/09/webTVIGcharter.html
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Kazuyuki
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/30/2010 02:44 AM, FUNAHASHI Yosuke wrote:
> >>> Hi Charles,
> >>>
> >>>> I suppose we need a little rule or discipline regarding the
> >>>> discussions on the IG in order for participants to carry their
> >>>> attention to the ongoing process cooperatively. I think we should
> >>>> explicitly show them the rule before they participate. I do not
> >>>> know
> >>>> whether the charter is appropriate or not as the place where we
> >>>> write
> >>>> down such matters.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Oh. You already included a comment about this topic in your updated
> >>> charter.
> >>> I appreciate your thoughtful update.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Yosuke
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kazuyuki Ashimura / W3C Multimodal & Voice Activity Lead
> >> mailto: ashimura@w3.org
> >> voice: +81.466.49.1170 / fax: +81.466.49.1171
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>

Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 00:57:15 UTC