- From: Don Marti <dmarti@cafemedia.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:12:38 -0700
- To: public-web-adv@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACA0g+q4-E1fBv-3S-VrOktBjw+y697DLtoPg-o96Kv=F69BGA@mail.gmail.com>
"Targeted" or "interest-based", advertising appears to have two key effects on the web advertising market. - Additional incremental ad revenue for publisher sites because of increased advertiser knowledge of audience composition and willingness to pay for an ad impression. - Leakage of ad revenue from high-engagement, high-reputation sites to lower-engagement sites where the same audience appears to be available. Different sources make different claims about the magnitude of the two effects (see links from the page below). In the past, it has been difficult for sites to take advantage of the first effect without enduring the second. However, today's ongoing process of moving the advertising market into the browser means that the rules of that market will be set by the user agent. In many cases the interest of the user in high-reputation ad-supported content aligns with the interests of high-reputation ad-supported sites, and the rules of the in-browser market can be adjusted to reflect that user interest. PUFFIN is a persistent per-browser floor price that the interest-group ad bid must also exceeed in order to win an in-browser auction. A PUFFIN is calculated based on an exponentially weighted rolling average of winning contextual ad bids. The interest-based ad must beat not only the highest-bidding contextual ad in the current auction, but also the average price for contextual ads that have previously appeared in the same browser. I anticipate that PUFFIN will be one of a family of ad price floor tweaks that user agents will be able to apply in order to maximize the user's gain in ad-supported content while minimizing the cost in computing resources and attention. https://github.com/dmarti/PUFFIN Issues and pull requests welcome.
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2021 17:13:08 UTC