- From: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 17:16:06 +0000
- To: Bruce Bailey <bruce@bailey4.us>, WCAG2ICT <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SJ0PR15MB45507E9ABC7454629A3D727D9439A@SJ0PR15MB4550.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Bruce. Feel free to add your proposed language adjustment to the Issue #772<https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/772> which I opened for us to work specifically on better language for 1.4.4 Resize Text. I brought over the pertinent comments from the AG WG review issue. Best regards, Mary Jo Mueller IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager From: Bruce Bailey <bruce@bailey4.us> Date: Thursday, August 21, 2025 at 8:12 AM To: WCAG2ICT <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [WCAG2ICT] Minutes for the 14 August meeting From the minutes: “We will not have a meeting next week - 21st August; We will resume on 28th August. ” I have added a proposal for language adjustment to the Google doc for 1. 4. 4 cited in Mary jo’s email. See you all next week! On Aug 14, 2025, From the minutes<https://www.w3.org/2025/08/14-wcag2ict-minutes.html#e1b6 >: “We will not have a meeting next week - 21st August; We will resume on 28th August.” I have added a proposal for language adjustment to the Google doc for 1.4.4 cited in Mary jo’s email. See you all next week! On Aug 14, 2025, at 12:56 PM, Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com> wrote: Hi all, Per the 14 August meeting, we have 2 tasks to address Jon Avila’s two comments on issue #750<https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/750 > for the AG WG review of the WCAG2ICT Note updates: 1. Comment on 1.4.10 Reflow Note 5<https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/750#issuecomment-3188996291 > – I created PR 768<https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/pull/768 > to implement what we discussed today for 1.4.10 Reflow. Indicate your thumbs up/down on this PR to indicate your support for the change. This PR deletes the note in question (Note 5 on 1.4.10 Reflow). 2. Comment on 1.4.4 Resize Text<https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/750#issuecomment-3186015764 > – I have provided some clarification in my comment that follows his. Not sure if that will sufficiently resolve his concern or if he further adjustment to the language is needed. Please take time to look at the language to see if you think adjustments are needed. If needed, I’ve created a Google doc for 1.4.4<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nsJZmuM_tIYNKMbwXgBLd81DlCCGGJfFlbPHwxUHgdI/edit?usp=sharing > where you can make a proposal for any language adjustments. This is time-critical because the EN 301 549 will be asking for final comments by 29 August. I’d like to resolve and come to consensus ASAP so we can have a resolution in the 28 August meeting. Thank you all for your dedication and attention to ensuring WCAG2ICT is an accurate and helpful resource. Best regards, Mary Jo Mueller IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2025 17:16:15 UTC