Re: [WCAG2ICT] PLEASE RESPOND ASAP! Updated proposal from the WAI team on Security Considerations

+1

Regards
Devanshu

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 10:07 AM Mitchell Evan <mevan@tpgi.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> Mitchell Evan (he/him)
>
> Principal Accessibility Engineer
>
> +49 (1525) 89 50 540
>
> +1 (510) 375 6104
>
>
>
> [image: TPGi]
>
> TPG Interactive
>
> www.tpgi.com
>
>
>
> A Vispero Company
>
> https://vispero.com/
>
>
>
> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us
> immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or
> omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message
> is prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
>
>
> *From:* Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 17, 2024 6:09 PM
> *To:* public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org
> *Subject:* [WCAG2ICT] PLEASE RESPOND ASAP! Updated proposal from the WAI
> team on Security Considerations
>
>
>
> CAUTION:EXTERNAL EMAIL SENDER!
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> There is one remaining document change for the group to approve regarding
> the Security Considerations section. Though the group had consensed on the
> Google doc Option 4
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YfD_Rxeg72vLZXBuV05BDvlKFCjwy5KZEOeeJSTtfLY/edit#heading=h.5ghwvutdd6xn>
> (an/or the edited Option 5
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YfD_Rxeg72vLZXBuV05BDvlKFCjwy5KZEOeeJSTtfLY/edit#heading=h.u10x3rl9ynll>
> from Mitch), the WAI leadership was concerned with the wording that it
> could be read that accessibility features increase security risks. They
> have come up with an alternative proposal.
>
>
>
> Please review Option 6: WAI Team input
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YfD_Rxeg72vLZXBuV05BDvlKFCjwy5KZEOeeJSTtfLY/edit#heading=h.oedhn5n84jd4>
> and the proposed answer to Issue 508
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YfD_Rxeg72vLZXBuV05BDvlKFCjwy5KZEOeeJSTtfLY/edit#heading=h.j3muqx2kheiz>.
> Respond with a +1, 0, or -1 to indicate whether you agree, are neutral, or
> disagree with the document change proposal as-is and that the issue answer
> is sufficient as-is. Note, the issue answer assumes the content proposal
> from WAI is approved by the group.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Mary Jo Mueller
>
> IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager
>
>
>