Plain-language "should"

I just noticed this<https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/understanding-techniques#techniques-are-informative>:

> Techniques are Informative
> ...
> Note 2: Techniques for WCAG 2.1<https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/> uses the words "must" and "should" only to clarify guidance within the techniques, not to convey requirements for WCAG.

It might be too late now, but a similar disclaimer in WCAG2ICT could have allowed us to write plainer language in some places.

Mitchell Evan (he/him)
Senior Accessibility Engineer

[Tpgi]
TPG Interactive
www.tpgi.com<https://www.tpgi.com/>

A Vispero Company
https://vispero.com/
+49 1525 89 50 540
+1 510 375 6104

This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately.
Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Received on Friday, 26 January 2024 18:37:57 UTC