- From: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 21:29:27 +0000
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@vanderheiden.us>, Mitchell Evan <mevan@tpgi.com>
- CC: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <MN2PR15MB31672A3100FD2E581CB6679C94552@MN2PR15MB3167.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Not according to the Intent for 1.4.5 Images of Text<https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/images-of-text.html#intent>. If the intent was to voice, the alt text containing the text in the image would suffice. Best regards, Mary Jo Mueller IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@vanderheiden.us> Date: Friday, February 23, 2024 at 1:58 PM To: Mitchell Evan <mevan@tpgi.com> Cc: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>, public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: For survey: 1.4.5 Images of Text, problematic for closed Programmatic does not relate to changing the appearance. It has to do with being accessible to AT. The AT might change the appearance but it could also just voicei it or sign it or anything else g On Feb 23, 2024, at 5: 38 PM, Mitchell Evan ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/PjiDSg!2S-vTDC_BPnUGoYV9s_r7al0ZC6ue76F04EwthdMdvQn5YQ3mZVxCjeKMqMWpIV3CUAbhCSp2NLAlceZhIZgSKtHSioR5g2Yd5swlTm4$> Report Suspicious <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/PjiDSg!2S-vTDC_BPnUGoYV9s_r7al0ZC6ue76F04EwthdMdvQn5YQ3mZVxCjeKMqMWpIV3CUAbhCSp2NLAlceZhIZgSKtHSioR5g2Yd5swlTm4$> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Programmatic does not relate to changing the appearance. It has to do with being accessible to AT. The AT might change the appearance but it could also just voicei it or sign it or anything else g On Feb 23, 2024, at 5:38 PM, Mitchell Evan <mevan@tpgi.com> wrote: Hi Mary Jo, Can we please survey the following options? I believe these capture the range of options that we discussed in our breakout call today. Option 6: like option 5, responding to Jon Avila’s comments in issue 276 1.4.5 Images of Text—Requires text in a programmatically determinable form, rather than images of text, so that users could customize the text visually. Option 7: like Mary Jo’s option 4; edited for brevity 1.4.5 Images of Text—Requires text for high-quality modification of displayed text (e.g. high contrast, increase of font size). Where other mechanisms achieve equivalent results, the intent of this success criterion would be met. Option 8: defer discussion Defer discussion on 1.4.5 Images of Text until we have first decided on 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value. Both criteria normatively rely on programmatic information. Pasted the above from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fpa7fX2Hdov3lduiJtSzb0EGSflSlxivtKmKGMsMobs/edit<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fpa7fX2Hdov3lduiJtSzb0EGSflSlxivtKmKGMsMobs/edit> Mitchell Evan (he/him) Senior Accessibility Engineer TPG Interactive https://www.tpgi.com<https://www.tpgi.com/> A Vispero Company https://www.vispero.com<https://www.vispero.com/> <image001.png><https://www.tpgi.com/csun-2024-at-conference-tpgi-sessions/> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Friday, 23 February 2024 21:29:52 UTC