- From: Alex Li <alli@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 23:33:42 +0000
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
- CC: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <bf5d0739f54843909bb40a84361b7ea3@BY2PR03MB112.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
I concur. -Alex From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 4:31 PM To: Peter Korn Cc: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force Subject: Re: Recently discovered issue with WCAG2ICT definition of "document" - suggesting a new note to clarify I think it is a good note, and important. And in keeping with our other advice. Gregg -------------------------------------------------------- Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D. Director Trace R&D Center Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Technical Director - Cloud4all Project - http://Cloud4all.info Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International - http://Raisingthefloor.org and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project - http://GPII.net On Jul 3, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com<mailto:peter.korn@oracle.com>> wrote: Hi gang, As part of a wider review of WCAG2ICT (asking colleagues who aren't on the Task Force to look at it), I just discovered an issue with the definition of "document<http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wcag2ict/#keyterms_document>". The issue is that readers will see the term "document" and think "file", and therefore try to apply WCAG requirements to all manner of files (virus definition files and programming files were two specific concerns that came up from colleagues). While our definition of "document" is based on the term "content<http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wcag2ict/#keyterms_content>" (which is scoped to "information and sensory experience to be communicated to the user"), I fear this fact is too easily missed. Therefore, I propose that we add an additional Note to clarify this: Note: Software configuration and storage files such as databases and virus definitions, as well as computer instruction files such as source code, batch/script files, and firmware, are not examples of documents. Such files are not "information and sensory experience to be communicated to the user" and therefore are not considered content. I have added that note in context, as proposed "(New) Note 3" in red text as part of the full definition of document, below: document (as used in WCAG2ICT) assembly of content<http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wcag2ict/#keyterms_content>, such as a file, set of files, or streamed media that is not part of software and that does not include its own user agent Note 1: A documents always requires a user agent to present its content to the user. Note 2: Letters, spreadsheets, emails, books, pictures, presentations, and movies are examples of documents. (New) Note 3: Software configuration and storage files such as databases and virus definitions, as well as computer instruction files such as source code, batch/script files, and firmware, are not examples of documents. Such files are not "information and sensory experience to be communicated to the user" and therefore are not considered content. Note 34: Anything that can present its own content without involving a user agent, such as a self playing book, is not a document but is software. Note 45: A single document may be composed of multiple files such as the video content, closed caption text, etc. This fact is not usually apparent to the end-user consuming the document / content. This is similar to how a single web page can be composed of content from multiple URIs (e.g. the page text, images, the JavaScript, a CSS file etc.). I would like to propose this edit as part of the WCAG WG review next Tuesday July 9th, so it can get into the 3rd/final public draft that we publish later in July. Any thoughts/edits before I do this as part of my WCAG WG "Ultimate? Survey"<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Ultimate/> response? Peter -- <oracle_sig_logo.gif><http://www.oracle.com/> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal Phone: +1 650 5069522<tel:+1%20650%205069522> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94064 <green-for-email-sig_0.gif><http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 23:35:03 UTC