- From: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:26:31 -0800
- To: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5126C947.20909@oracle.com>
Hi gang, In order to help make our meeting tomorrow more efficient (and was hoped our previous meeting last Friday), Mike did an analysis of the survey feedback, noting where the survey feedback seemed to be in agreement and where it didn't. I have taken his analysis notes, and transferred the survey feedback summary/conclusions into a new column added as the rightmost of our two tables comparing documents and comparing software, at https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/comparison-to-m376 This new column is titled "TF Resolution", and the intent is that it will contain the final TF resolutions once we are done. For now, however, it contains Mike's survey feedback notes with the exception of the ONE SC we did manage to discuss and reach consensus on last week - SC 1.4.4 for documents. The editorial plan is that as we reach consensus on each of these, we will add a "consensus date" to them, and I will also change the color highlight to teal to indicate consensus was reached (see that in SC 1.4.4 for documents). Anything without such a date and highlight color is not yet a TF consensus, but is rather at best a "potential consensus" based on survey feedback (those are highlighted in green, and typically read "TF agrees..."). For the purposes of efficiently going through these 71 SCs, we may want to follow the color coding and quickly dispatch those that seem easy first (which will generally be the green highlighted ones)... Regards, Peter -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal Phone: +1 650 5069522 <tel:+1%20650%205069522> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 01:27:36 UTC