RE: Definition of Documents -- OOPS - error fixed -- use this email to comment from Michael Pluke on 2013-08-22 (public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org from August 2013)

From: Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:16:14 -0400
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
CC: Alex Li <alli@microsoft.com>, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>, "Bailey, Bruce" <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>, "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5735ED0D92A3E6469F161EB41E7C28A88C84E06E54@MAILR001.mail.lan>

OK - that is fine by me. I must have misread the discussion and thought that there was some renewed concerns about it. One less thing for me to worry about :)

Mike

From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu]
Sent: 22 August 2013 18:09
To: Michael Pluke
Cc: Alex Li; Peter Korn; Bailey, Bruce; public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force
Subject: Re: Definition of Documents -- OOPS - error fixed -- use this email to comment

On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com<mailto:Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>> wrote:

I have not yet formed an opinion regarding Note 3.
Best regards
Mike

Mike - I think Note 3 is already part of the item --
I think we reached consensus on it awhile ago .

Gregg

Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 17:16:45 UTC