- From: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:05:23 -0700
- To: Alex Li <alli@microsoft.com>
- CC: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <521296A3.4060902@oracle.com>
Gregg, Alex,
I don't see how Gregg's change addresses hard drive partitions. BUT
they are already addressed by our Note 3, so I'm not worried about those.
Further, as I think about this, I think the other concern of an e-mail
file is likewise addressed by our Note 3 ("software configuration AND
STORAGE FILES such as databases"). A mail file containing in a single
file an entire folder of e-mails is fundamentally a simple flat file
database STORAGE FILE.
I don't mind the generalization language that Gregg suggests inserting.
It makes Note 3 more of a specific example of the general new phrase
Gregg proposes. But I also think we were prescient enough in crafting
the language of Note 3 to cover all of the examples cited so far as
potential problems.
Peter
On 8/19/2013 1:54 PM, Alex Li wrote:
>
> Gregg,
>
> How does the change prevent readers from interpreting a hard drive
> partition as a "single entity"?
>
> All best,
>
> Alex
>
> *From:*Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 19, 2013 1:32 PM
> *To:* public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force
> *Subject:* Definition of Documents -- OOPS - error fixed -- use this
> email to comment
>
> Sorry,
>
> grabbed the wrong draft - here is the actual current definition with
> change. (last one was missing the new note 3)
>
> G
>
> In responding to comments made during our public review of WCAG2ICT it
> appears that we have a flaw in our definition of document. Our current
> definition is:
>
> *document (as used in WCAG2ICT)***
>
> assembly of content
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content>, such as a file,
> set of files, or streamed media that is not part of software and that
> does not include its own user agent
>
> *Note 1: *A document always requires a user agent to present its
> content <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content> to the user.
>
> *Note 2: *Letters, spreadsheets, emails, books, pictures,
> presentations, and movies are examples of documents.
>
> *Note 3: *Software configuration and storage files such as databases
> and virus definitions, as well as computer instruction files such as
> source code, batch/script files, and firmware, are examples of files
> that function as part of software
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_software> and thus are
> not examples of documents. If and where software retrieves
> "information and sensory experience to be communicated to the user"
> from such files, it is just another part of the content
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content> that occurs in
> software and is covered by WCAG2ICT like any other parts of the
> software. Where such files contain one or more embedded documents, the
> embedded documents remain documents under this definition.
>
> *Note 4: *Anything that can present its own content
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content> without
> involving a user agent, such as a self playing book, is not a document
> but is software <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_software>.
>
> *Note 5: *A single document may be composed of multiple files such as
> the video content, closed caption text, etc. This fact is not usually
> apparent to the end-user consuming the document / content
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content>. This is similar
> to how a single web page can be composed of content from multiple URIs
> (e.g. the page text, images, the JavaScript, a CSS file etc.).
>
> however, this definition is so broad that an entire email system
> (such as Outlook which stores all of the email in a single .PST file)
> would qualify as a single document. In fact, an entire hard drive
> (that did not contain the OS or apps that displayed it) could be
> considered a document.
>
> I therefore suggest that the phrase
>
> *" that is meant to function as a single entity rather than a
> collection,"*
>
> be added so that it reads:
>
> assembly of content, such as a file, set of files, or streamed media
> *that is meant to function as a single entity rather than a
> collection,* that is not part of software, and that does not include
> its own user agent
>
> Comments welcome
>
> /Gregg/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
> Director Trace R&D Center
> Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering
> and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison
>
> Technical Director - Cloud4all Project - http://Cloud4all.info
> Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International -
> http://Raisingthefloor.org
> and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project - http://GPII.net
>
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal
Phone: +1 650 5069522 <tel:+1%20650%205069522>
500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065
Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to
developing practices and products that help protect the environment
Received on Monday, 19 August 2013 22:06:05 UTC