- From: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:05:23 -0700
- To: Alex Li <alli@microsoft.com>
- CC: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <521296A3.4060902@oracle.com>
Gregg, Alex, I don't see how Gregg's change addresses hard drive partitions. BUT they are already addressed by our Note 3, so I'm not worried about those. Further, as I think about this, I think the other concern of an e-mail file is likewise addressed by our Note 3 ("software configuration AND STORAGE FILES such as databases"). A mail file containing in a single file an entire folder of e-mails is fundamentally a simple flat file database STORAGE FILE. I don't mind the generalization language that Gregg suggests inserting. It makes Note 3 more of a specific example of the general new phrase Gregg proposes. But I also think we were prescient enough in crafting the language of Note 3 to cover all of the examples cited so far as potential problems. Peter On 8/19/2013 1:54 PM, Alex Li wrote: > > Gregg, > > How does the change prevent readers from interpreting a hard drive > partition as a "single entity"? > > All best, > > Alex > > *From:*Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] > *Sent:* Monday, August 19, 2013 1:32 PM > *To:* public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force > *Subject:* Definition of Documents -- OOPS - error fixed -- use this > email to comment > > Sorry, > > grabbed the wrong draft - here is the actual current definition with > change. (last one was missing the new note 3) > > G > > In responding to comments made during our public review of WCAG2ICT it > appears that we have a flaw in our definition of document. Our current > definition is: > > *document (as used in WCAG2ICT)*** > > assembly of content > <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content>, such as a file, > set of files, or streamed media that is not part of software and that > does not include its own user agent > > *Note 1: *A document always requires a user agent to present its > content <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content> to the user. > > *Note 2: *Letters, spreadsheets, emails, books, pictures, > presentations, and movies are examples of documents. > > *Note 3: *Software configuration and storage files such as databases > and virus definitions, as well as computer instruction files such as > source code, batch/script files, and firmware, are examples of files > that function as part of software > <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_software> and thus are > not examples of documents. If and where software retrieves > "information and sensory experience to be communicated to the user" > from such files, it is just another part of the content > <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content> that occurs in > software and is covered by WCAG2ICT like any other parts of the > software. Where such files contain one or more embedded documents, the > embedded documents remain documents under this definition. > > *Note 4: *Anything that can present its own content > <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content> without > involving a user agent, such as a self playing book, is not a document > but is software <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_software>. > > *Note 5: *A single document may be composed of multiple files such as > the video content, closed caption text, etc. This fact is not usually > apparent to the end-user consuming the document / content > <http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#wcag2ict-def_content>. This is similar > to how a single web page can be composed of content from multiple URIs > (e.g. the page text, images, the JavaScript, a CSS file etc.). > > however, this definition is so broad that an entire email system > (such as Outlook which stores all of the email in a single .PST file) > would qualify as a single document. In fact, an entire hard drive > (that did not contain the OS or apps that displayed it) could be > considered a document. > > I therefore suggest that the phrase > > *" that is meant to function as a single entity rather than a > collection,"* > > be added so that it reads: > > assembly of content, such as a file, set of files, or streamed media > *that is meant to function as a single entity rather than a > collection,* that is not part of software, and that does not include > its own user agent > > Comments welcome > > /Gregg/ > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D. > Director Trace R&D Center > Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering > and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison > > Technical Director - Cloud4all Project - http://Cloud4all.info > Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International - > http://Raisingthefloor.org > and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project - http://GPII.net > -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal Phone: +1 650 5069522 <tel:+1%20650%205069522> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
Received on Monday, 19 August 2013 22:06:05 UTC