- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:21:52 -0500
- To: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
- Message-id: <76027C3E-C272-4A2B-AACF-0F75ACCD1E75@trace.wisc.edu>
We have been working on both the Key Terms and the "final three" and now is time for feedback So look these two pages over -- and fill out the survey that will be out tomorrow. 1) KEY TERMS section for the intro the key terms I think are pretty far along based on our team https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/introduction-to-wcag2ict-application-note/key-terms 2) Proposal for the FINAL THREE success criteria You can find these listed as Proposal 4 - at the top of the following page https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/remaining-3-scs A draft of the "FINAL THREE success criteria " was posted to the list earlier. the following changes have been made in response to comments > Gregg, > > I too am pleased with the direction this is going. > > I feel the "common block" needs some per-SC tweaking / augmenting. Agree. For each of the SC you will see there is a place to add extra text for each SC that goes beyond the common block. > For example, in Bypass Blocks, I think there should be a Note detailing some of the "mechanisms" for bypassing may be in order (e.g. skipping over the previews in a set of movies in a movie trilogy, to get directly to the main menu; etc.). Good idea. I'm not sure the movie trilogy works -- the trailers usually are different for different parts but if they are the same -- it should be possible to skip them. I think all trailers can be skipped though - so sort of a no-op. (what you CAN'T skip is the FBI warning.... what a pain. But I don't think we can say that is an accessibility issue because everyone needs to sit through that. There is no disadvantage to having a disability (once you get used to the fact that there will always be a large silence if you are blind.) . ) Any other examples welcome. > We also had draft text for earlier versions of Multiple Ways that clarified the ease with which that was met. I think it is important to have that here - the "common block" doesn't address that. I found the text and it is added to SC 2.4.5 > Finally, I would like to also note for software that we also had problems determining what was a "navigational mechanism". That is for SC 3.2.3. I have added text for that. check it and improve it. > > > Regards, > > Peter
Received on Monday, 29 October 2012 03:22:28 UTC