Re: Closed non-embedded content???

Yes Mike, I see your point, but it could also be argued that it is the
software that is doing the interactivity, not the content itself... but we
do have success criteria related to the interactivity defined in content.
And I see no trouble with that.

As for an example for non-web non-embedded content with closed
functionality, I still think we can use the example of a document with a
"speech output = no" flag without saying that this is related to DRM.

Best regards,
Loïc


On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Michael Pluke <
Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com> wrote:

> I think that some people claim that it is the software that respects the
> DRM that is doing the closing, not the content itself? DRM is a very
> sensitive subject for those that apply it and those that are affected by
> it. There are with many very different interpretations of what DRM
> represents.
>
> So it would be ideal to have an example of non-Web non-embedded content
> other than the contentious issue of DRM.
>
> Best regards
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bailey, Bruce [mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov]
> Sent: 22 October 2012 13:16
> To: Michael Pluke
> Cc: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Closed non-embedded content???
>
> > I fired a question to the list to see if there was an answer to the
> question - "Is there such a thing as closed non-Web non-embedded content?"
>
> I feel like I am missing something.  Is not the previously offered example
> of DRM encumbered eBook file non-Web non-embedded content?
>
>


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Loïc Martínez-Normand
DLSIIS. Facultad de Informática
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Campus de Montegancedo
28660 Boadilla del Monte
Madrid
---------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: loic@fi.upm.es
tfno: +34 91 336 74 11
---------------------------------------------------------------