On Oct 4, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com> wrote:
> I remain concerned with how things would sort out in practice for our 4 unresolved SCs, particularly for software. I want to review some of our examples with this approach, and see how that feels (e.g. Bypass Blocks - what is "repeated content" in software that would be bypassed?
The examples would be a good way to examine this.
> What constitutes a software title that describes the topic or purpose?
The examples of course would not be any good for this -- since the object of eval is the software -- not subcomponents of it. But your following examples are good things to test the concept.
> Is "Skype" or "Pidgin" "Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro" or "NetBeans IDE 7.0" a title for software that sufficiently "describes the topic or purpose"?
Yes - the name of an application has always been accepted as a suitable description of it. Otherwise links would all fail as just one example. So there is no reason it should not be here.
> (of four random apps on my computer at the moment - which respectively do IM and audio and video conferencing, IM via a bunch of different protocols than Skype, read & author PDF documents, and a developer tool for creating any of a huge variety of types of programs)? ).
Thanks
G