Editors' draft of WCAG2ICT

An editors' draft of WCAG2ICT is available in W3C space:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2012/WD-wcag2ict-20120726/

I have been working with the editorial team to refine the structure and
presentation of this document. I expect to continue with some minor
style enhancements but otherwise this document is substantially in the
form I expect to publish Thursday.

A number of people agreed to review this draft, which I appreciate. I
will need reviews within the next 24 hours, and I hope you don't find
anything major, just tweaks. :) Some questions to help steer your
review, in descending order of priority:

   1. Does the WCAG2ICT content (under the headings "Additional Guidance
      when applying..." match the version that had consensus of the
      WCAG2ICT Task Force and the WCAG Working Group?
   2. Is there any WCAG2ICT consensus content that is missing?
   3. Do the quotes from Understanding WCAG 2.0 include the
      modifications raised by the task force and agreed to by the WCAG WG?
   4. Do the quotes from Understanding and WCAG otherwise look ok?
          * The biggest issue I could expect is that content that was
            deleted is still showing up, though I've tried to check for
            that.
          * It is also possible that formatting from the original
            documents did not correctly carry through into this document.
   5. Is the overall structure and semantics of this document easy to
      understand and follow (considering the content)? Feedback from
      screen reader users would be particularly helpful.
   6. Do you have any input on the visual style? I can't apply all style
      suggestions because there are style rules for W3C formal
      publications, but within the framework have attempted to make the
      document easy to read or skim visually.

Michael
-- 

Michael Cooper
Web Accessibility Specialist
World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative
E-mail cooper@w3.org <mailto:cooper@w3.org>
Information Page <http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/>