- From: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:47:28 -0700
- To: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4FFF7020.9050404@oracle.com>
Hi gang, SC *3.2.3 <https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/3-understandable/32-make-web-pages-appear-and-operate-in-predictable-ways/323-consistent-navigation>*****was not one we reached consensus on, nor have we had much discussion about it. My thoughts on that can be found at the Applying UI Context <https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/user-interface-context/applying-ui-context> page in the seventh row, but to facilitate discussion, I reiterate them here. The software portion of the UIC Proposal is: This applies to software aspects of products directly as written and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG (above) with the word "user interface context" substituted for Web Page and "software program" substituted for "Set of Web Pages". I don't think this SC really make sense in software. I find it to be a lot like Bypass Blocks. It is either generally automatically satisfied (and so of little added value), or it can be looked at based on Intent and Understanding, and applied more thoughtfully to software (e.g. for cognitive disabilities, some variant of "things that look the same should behave the same, things that behave differently should look different"). I think the right thing to do is go back to WCAG and see if we have their blessing to either say this doesn't really apply, or to develop something more fitting and appropriate to software. Peter -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal Phone: +1 650 5069522 <tel:+1%20650%205069522> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 00:48:02 UTC