Looking at open comments from 1st public draft

Here is a summary of the issues in the 13 open
comments<https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-wcag2ict-20120727/?status=open&>[1]
from the first draft and some suggested groupings for working on them.

LC-2669, LC-2679, and LC-2681 are all comments on the issue of navigation
being quite different in non-web documents than on websites.

LC-2689, LC-2691, LC-2677, and LC-2680 are all comments on WCAG 2.0
requirements that should not be applicable outside of the web context
(keyboard, 2.4.1, 2.4.5).

LC-2694 and LC-2693 are suggesting exceptions be added to two success
criteria (3.2.2 and 3.3.4)

LC-2688 and LC-2695 are about conformance - since the task force hasn't yet
addressed conformance, perhaps these two should be deferred?

LC-2676 is asking how 1.3.1 applies to a particular type of non-web
document.

LC-2682 is about 4.1.2, specifically that it doesn't address pre-filled
form fields in PDF documents.

If you have some time, please take one or a related group of these and
develop a proposed response that we can survey for Friday's meeting.

[1]
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-wcag2ict-20120727/?status=open&

Andi