- From: WCAG 2.0 Techniques Submission Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:42:52 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-wcag2-techs@w3.org
Submitter's Name: Laura Carlson Submitter's Email: laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com Technique ID: UNKNOWN Short Name: Providing Text Alternatives for Images of Text Technique Category: HTML and XHTML Techniques Guideline Reference: text-equiv Success Criterion Reference: UNKNOWN Applicability: Applies to HTML UA Issues: None known Description: The objective of this technique is explain and demonstrate how to markup images of text. Mark up images of text so that they will provide assistive technology with equivalent information. Provide a text equivalent that is the same as that provided in the image. Examples include pictures of: * Words * Phrases * Wordmark Example 1 Head: Acme Company's wordmark which visually reads "Acme Company" in a fancy designed image. Example 1 Description: <img src="wordmark.png" alt="Acme Company"> Example 2 Head: An image of the word "New!". Example 2 Description: <img src="new.png" alt="New!"> Resource 1 Title: Web Design References: Accessibility Resource 1 URI: http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/accessibility.html#alt Related Techniques: G94 G95 G100 H37 Test Procedure: 1. remove, hide, or mask the non-text content 2. replace it with the text alternative 3. Check that nothing is lost (the purpose of the non-text content is met by the text alternative) 4. If the non-text content contains words that are important to understanding the content, the words are included in the text alternative. Expected Result: Check #3 is true. If the non-text content contains words that are important to understanding the content, check #4 is also true. Additional Notes: This technique is part of the HTMLWG's Action 54: First Draft http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Action54AltAttribute If it is accepted by WCAG we hope to remove it from our document as stated in the second draft http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Action54AltAttributeSecondDraft#head-f0bf2ebf9f3e1fa190974101c6b70700ff176772 The Action 54 first draft provides much non-normative guidance in the application of the ALT attribute, which may not be appropriate for inclusion in a markup language specification, and which moreover could be seen as usurping the role of WCAG 2.0 and its techniques documents. A format specification is not a tutorial. It would be very helpful if the Techniques for WCAG 2.0. could incorporate this information or a variation of it. Then the HTML5 spec could link to it. As PF has said, "WCAG WG is chartered to set Accessibility guidelines and HTML WG is not". http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Feb/0082.html Thank you, The HTMLWG Action 54 Team: Steven Faulkner Joshue O Connor Laura Carlson Peer reviewers: Gez Lemon Gregory Rosmaita No resource 2 title submitted! No resource 2 URI submitted! No test file 1 was submitted! No test file 1 pass/fail was submitted! No test file 2 was submitted! No test file 2 pass/fail was submitted! ------------------------------------------------ <technique id="UNKNOWN"> <short-name>Providing Text Alternatives for Images of Text</short-name> <applies-to> <guideline idref="text-equiv" /> <success-criterion idref="UNKNOWN" /> </applies-to> <applicability> Applies to HTML </applicability> <ua_issues> None known </ua_issues> <description> The objective of this technique is explain and demonstrate how to markup images of text. Mark up images of text so that they will provide assistive technology with equivalent information. Provide a text equivalent that is the same as that provided in the image. Examples include pictures of: * Words * Phrases * Wordmark </description> <examples> <ex_head_1> Acme Company's wordmark which visually reads "Acme Company" in a fancy designed image. </ex_head_1> <ex_desc_1> <img src="wordmark.png" alt="Acme Company"> </ex_desc_1> <ex_head_2> An image of the word "New!". </ex_head_2> <ex_desc_2> <img src="new.png" alt="New!"> </ex_desc_2> </examples> <resources> <resources_title1> Web Design References: Accessibility </resources_title1> <resource_uri1> http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/accessibility.html#alt </resource_uri1> <resources_title2> </resources_title2> <resource_uri2> </resource_uri2> </resources> <related_techniques> <related_technique> G94 </related_technique> <related_technique> G95 </related_technique> <related_technique> G100 </related_technique> <related_technique> H37 </related_technique> </related_techniques> <tests> <procedure> 1. remove, hide, or mask the non-text content 2. replace it with the text alternative 3. Check that nothing is lost (the purpose of the non-text content is met by the text alternative) 4. If the non-text content contains words that are important to understanding the content, the words are included in the text alternative. </procedure> <expected_result> Check #3 is true. If the non-text content contains words that are important to understanding the content, check #4 is also true. </expected_result> <test_file_1> </test_file_1> <pass_fail_1> </pass_fail_1> <test_file_2> </test_file_2> <pass_fail_2> </pass_fail_2> </tests> </technique> Additional Notes: This technique is part of the HTMLWG's Action 54: First Draft http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Action54AltAttribute If it is accepted by WCAG we hope to remove it from our document as stated in the second draft http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Action54AltAttributeSecondDraft#head-f0bf2ebf9f3e1fa190974101c6b70700ff176772 The Action 54 first draft provides much non-normative guidance in the application of the ALT attribute, which may not be appropriate for inclusion in a markup language specification, and which moreover could be seen as usurping the role of WCAG 2.0 and its techniques documents. A format specification is not a tutorial. It would be very helpful if the Techniques for WCAG 2.0. could incorporate this information or a variation of it. Then the HTML5 spec could link to it. As PF has said, "WCAG WG is chartered to set Accessibility guidelines and HTML WG is not". http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Feb/0082.html Thank you, The HTMLWG Action 54 Team: Steven Faulkner Joshue O Connor Laura Carlson Peer reviewers: Gez Lemon Gregory Rosmaita
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2008 16:43:25 UTC