Re: Regular agenda

Minutes<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/wiki/2024%E2%80%9006%E2%80%9021> from today are posted to the wiki.

From: Storr, Francis <francis.storr@intel.com>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 1:18 PM
To: Lori Oakley <lori.oakley@oracle.com>; Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>; WCAG2 Backlog <public-wcag2-issues@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Regular agenda

Scott's had a draft Google Doc for weeks that people can review and give feedback on. It's linked to in the minutes from 26th April: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/wiki/2024%E2%80%9004%E2%80%9026

There's been some feedback in that document - maybe there's enough to re-start the work in Friday calls?

From: Lori Oakley <lori.oakley@oracle.com<mailto:lori.oakley@oracle.com>>
Date: Friday, June 21, 2024 at 09:23
To: Storr, Francis <francis.storr@intel.com<mailto:francis.storr@intel.com>>, Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com<mailto:michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>>, WCAG2 Backlog <public-wcag2-issues@w3.org<mailto:public-wcag2-issues@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: [External] : Re: Regular agenda
+1 if Scott is ready

From: Storr, Francis <francis.storr@intel.com<mailto:francis.storr@intel.com>>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 8:54 AM
To: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com<mailto:michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>>; WCAG2 Backlog <public-wcag2-issues@w3.org<mailto:public-wcag2-issues@w3.org>>
Subject: [External] : Re: Regular agenda

Can we spend some time on Reflow soon please? It would be great to get that sorted out. Personally, I'd much rather go a little slower on the backlog for a few weeks so we can concentrate on Reflow.

Thanks

Francis

From: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com<mailto:michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>>
Date: Friday, June 21, 2024 at 07:20
To: WCAG2 Backlog <public-wcag2-issues@w3.org<mailto:public-wcag2-issues@w3.org>>
Subject: Regular agenda

  1.  Review 'For discussion' items
  2.  Review 'Drafted' items (30 min), either:

     *   move back to In progress, with more work to do
     *   move to Ready for approval, if there is general agreement the issue is sufficiently resolved
     *   leave in Drafted, if discussion was not concluded satisfactorily

  1.  Review issues closed<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+sort%3Aupdated-desc+no%3Aproject> and project items closed<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+sort%3Aupdated-desc+project%3Aw3c%2F56+>.
  2.  Review 'To do'.
  3.  Time permitting, items of interest to participants, including open discussions.

Meeting information<https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/12f8250b-23af-4dc1-b25c-6285873846ce/20240119T110000/>