- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 12:41:58 +0000
- To: "WCAG 2.x issues list (public-wcag2-issues@w3.org)" <public-wcag2-issues@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <PR3PR09MB53478E81876F302176193059B9389@PR3PR09MB5347.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Folks, I think there’s a fair overlap in the people on this list and those who have (or could) help with testing WCAG 2.2 implementations… The full site ones are in progress, there are a few things for the individual criteria I’ll focus on here. This is a plea for help, we’ve made good progress but there are some that need a second evaluation, and some where we still need some passing sites. Accessible authentication We have 4 sites with 1 evaluation done (or at least started): * Microsoft (AAA) * UKWindsurfing.com (I run this site, you can create an account for free and then login. Just don’t use a Microsoft email account as they bounce our email ☹ ) * Peakdesign (AAA) * Login.gov (this one requires you to have a security key for the passing scenario, I haven’t finished this one yet.) If anyone can hop on and test those as the second evaluator, that will mean those are done. I screen-shotted each separately, so you can see my workings (linked to) from the google doc below. Consistent Help We have one done completely, and a second (Argos) which needs a second evaluator. That should be an easy one to pickup. Dragging Movements We have two with one evaluation and need a second: * Trello (free account needed, or review my screenshots) * Google drive (free account needed, or review my screenshots) Focus Appearance * Christoph Strobe submitted a site which I evaluated, needs a second evaluation. * We need another site. I’ve asked someone at Gov.uk, but they have one component (on every page) that needs updating before it would pass. * Does anyone have another site? Focus Not Obscured We still need 4 sites for this, 2 at AA and 2 at AAA. I.e. a site which has some sticky content that could block focus-indicators but doesn’t. Any ideas? Redundant Entry We still need two sites for this, any ideas? I.e. a site which asks for information twice in a process, and provides a way to copy or auto-fill it. Target Size (Minimum) * Strobe’s site passes this, we need a second evaluator to confirm. * We need a second site. The list of tests underway are here: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG22/CR/implementations The notes on current status and links are here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1avNVZFsbTdc6LjqsXqysTh6n6goijouGk1Eio0lLpsQ/edit# Help please! Kind regards, -Alastair -- @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2022 12:42:56 UTC