- From: Sofia Celic <Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:04:32 +1100
- To: "Andi Snow-Weaver" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
I'm not sure about this one. If " it is not required to provide a mechanism to restart the movement to conform to this Success Criterion " then we shouldn't use a word that suggests this requirement in the SC. How about we say something like: "Content can be stopped, and restarted as necessary, by the user unless the timing or movement is part of an activity where timing or movement is essential" Sofia ____________________________ Dr Sofia Celic Assistant Manager Online Accessibility & Senior Web Accessibility Consultant Vision Australia - Accessible Information Solutions 454 Glenferrie Road Kooyong, Victoria, 3144 P: +61 (0)3 9864 9284 F: +61 (0)3 9864 9370 E-mail: Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org.au www.visionaustralia.org.au -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andi Snow-Weaver Sent: Saturday, 17 February 2007 7:23 AM To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org Subject: 1169 ready for Team C review Per my action item yesterday, I have modified 1169. The agenda section on the Team C page doesn't look current so I'm not sure what process you guys are using now. But we should discuss this one on Monday. http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?i d=1169 Andi ________________________________ << ella for Spam Control >> has removed 492 Spam messages and set aside 207 Later for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! www.ellaforspam.com
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 06:04:58 UTC