Re: Proposals 5 Feb 07

I'm confused about 488, that change has already been made in the internal 
working draft AND is credited towards 488?  But, 488 is linked to 1201 
which is also shown as resolved indicates that it had a wording change for 
GL 1.3.  However, the wording change is in the Working group Notes section 
 but it is worded as an actual resolution. I think we are all set but may 
want to clarify what the actual change was for 1201.

I'm a bit concerned that 757 is a bit too HTML specific - but since we use 
label in 2.4.5 and have a definition for it I guess I can live with this 
wording.

1238:  While I agree that the failure for 2.1.1 is needed, I think we may 
need to actually put the requirement that the user must be able interact 
with the mechanism into the SC.  Perhaps we can split the conditions into 
2 set - one that allows for deactivating/adjusting/extending via a 
mechanism before the time-out occurs and the other set with the actual 
exceptions. 



Becky Gibson
Web Accessibility Architect
                                                       
IBM Emerging Internet Technologies
5 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
Voice: 978 399-6101; t/l 333-6101
Email: gibsonb@us.ibm.com




Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> 
Sent by: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org
02/05/2007 01:01 PM

To
List Team C <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
cc

Subject
Proposals 5 Feb 07






Here are some issue proposals to review and discuss in today's call:
488
719
757
764
1169
1238 and Failure due to providing a mechanism to adjust time limits that 
users may not find before the time limit expires
-- 
Michael Cooper
Web Accessibility Specialist
World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative
E-mail cooper@w3.org
Information Page

Received on Monday, 5 February 2007 21:35:52 UTC