- From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:59:08 -0500
- To: gian@tkh.com.au
- Cc: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
Gian, You submitted the following comment on 2.2.1 and 2.2.2: >2.2.1 & 2.2.3: As previously discussed, further details should be provided when timeouts is an important part of a real-time event or an activity when timing is essential. >Proposed Change: >I am happy to write an additional set of criteria (with Loretta) I agree that the use of the word "important" is subjective. Can you write a draft of what you have in mind or give me an idea of what you are thinking so I can start a draft? Andi
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 19:59:29 UTC